BRAINLIFE Brain Tumor Medical Database

Treatment > Radiosurgery


38th ASCO Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL. May 18-21, 2002. Abstract No. 319. (Clinical Study)


Meeting Abstract

Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of cervical spine metastases

Steven A Burton, Peter Gerszten, Ron Lalonde, Alex Chen, John Flickinger, William Welch, Shalom Kalnicki

UPMC-Shadyside, Pittsburgh, PA; UPMC-Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, PA

Purpose. The goal of this study was to examine the feasibility of the CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery system in the palliative treatment of patients with metastases to the cervical spine.

Methods. Ten patients with metastatic disease to the cervical spine were treated with single fraction radiosurgery with the CyberKnife (Accuray, Inc.,Sunnyvale, CA) to a dose of 12 Gy to the 80% isodose line.
Patients were immobilized with an aquaplast mask.
CT scans were obtained for treatment planning using 3 mm slices.
The target volume ranged from 1.8 to 28.5 cc with a mean of 10.7 cc.
Each plan was tested with a phantom to assure 1 mm accuracy.
The maximum spinal cord dose was 6.3 to 10.1 Gy with a mean of 8.2 Gy.
The primary tumor was breast (4 patients); lung (3 patients); pancreas (1 patient); and osteosarcoma (1 patient).
Four patients had received prior radiation therapy, and one patient received a boost with radiosurgery.

Results. Patients were treated in the outpatient setting with an average treatment time of 30-40 minutes.
There was no acute radiation toxicity or neurologic deficits.
Three patients had transient flare of neck pain.
Pain was significantly improved in the 8 of the 9 patients who were symptomatic prior to treatment.

Conclusions. Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery was found to be feasible and safe.
It provided rapid palliation of pain from metastases to the cervial spine in a single outpatient treatment.
The advantages of stereotactic radiosurgery for cervical spine metastases as compared to external beam radiation therapy include decreased toxicity (mucositis, marrow suppression), ability to treat patients who had previously received radiation therapy, and shorter treatment duration with improved patient cenvenience and more rapid systemic therapy.
Longer follow-up is needed to determine potential late complications and duration of response.

© Copyright 2002 American Society of Clinical Oncology

Source: http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002324-00_18-002002-00_19-00319-00_29-00A-00_42-00ONeill-00_43-00-00_44-00-00_45-00
Author-00_46-00Title-00_47-00Title-00_48-00and-00_49-00and,00.asp?cat=CNS+Tumors&parent=CENTRAL+NERVOUS+SYSTEM+TUMORS
&returnpid=2323



 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. HOMECURRENT NEURO-ONCOLOGYGLIOBLASTOMA REPORTSBRAIN TUMOR MEDICAL DATABASE SERVICES TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR GLIOBLASTOMA
DATABASE by Section: Classification | Diagnosis | Epidemiology | Etiology & Pathogenesis | Integrative Medicine | Overall Management | Prognosis | Psychosocial Aspects | Stem Cells | Treatment
DATABASE by Tumor: Glioblastoma | Medulloblastoma | Other TumorsSERVICES: About BrainLife | Children's Corner | Dedication | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Privacy Policy | Publications | Search | SiteMap
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here bottom