Treatment > Doxorubicin · Tamoxifen


38th ASCO Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL. May 18-21, 2002. Abstract No.312 (Clinical Study)


Meeting Abstract

Liposomal doxorubicin with and without tamoxifen in the salvage treatment of high grade glioma - a phase-II study

Peter Hau, Joerg Dietrich, Klaus Fabel, Ulrike Baumgart, Oliver Grauer, Tanya Jauch, Anton Zellner, Martin Proescholdt, Andreas Steinbrecher, Alexander Brawanski, Peter Krauseneck, Ulrich Bogdahn

University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Nervenklinik Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

Purpose. Resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and poor blood brain barrier (BBB) penetration are major obstacles in the treatment of malignant glioma. Doxorubicin is known to be effective in high-grade glioma cell lines and was shown to cross BBB in a liposomal encapsulated formulation (Caelyx®, CAE).
In two subsequent phase II-studies, CAE was administered as a single agent or in combination with Tamoxifen (TAM) in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

Methods. Applying an intention-to-treat design, 40 patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (grade IV, n = 28; grade III, n = 12) were included and treated with intravenous CAE 20 mg/sqm BS every two weeks (20 patients) and, in the second study, with CAE plus oral TAM in a continuous daily dose of 480 mg (20 patients).
Every 6 weeks, response was evaluated clinically and by use of MRI.

Results. The single agent regimen and the combination therapy were equally well tolerated, with major side effects being palmaroplantar erythrodysesthesia in 17/40 patients and myelosuppression (WHO grade III) in 10/40 patients.
Cardiac toxicity has not been observed so far.
TAM was well tolerated even in this high doses with deep venous thrombosis in a single patient. In both regimens together, 16/40 (40%) patients showed objective responses with partial response in 2/40 and disease stabilization in 14/40 patients.
Response rates in the CAE regimen (45%) vs. the CAE/TAM regimen (35%) were significantly different, but in the latter regimen, 16 patients had grade IV tumors in comparison to 11 in the CAE regimen.
Median overall survival after initiation of salvage therapy was 32 weeks for CAE and 24 weeks for CAE/TAM, or 28 weeks for grade-IV and 24 weeks for grade-III, respectively.

Discussion. Single agent therapy with CAE and the combination of CAE and TAM appear to have similar moderate activity in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent high-grade glioma.
Both regimens are save concerning myelotoxicity, skin toxicity and cardiac complications.

© Copyright 2002 American Society of Clinical Oncology

Source: http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002324-00_18-002002-00_19-00312-00_29-00A-00_42-00ONeill-00_43-00-00_44-00-00_45-00
Author-00_46-00Title-00_47-00Title-00_48-00and-00_49-00and,00.asp?cat=CNS+Tumors&parent=CENTRAL+NERVOUS+SYSTEM+TUMORS
&returnpid=2323



 

HOME | Detection | Diagnosis | Epidemiology | Etiology & Pathogenesis | Integrative Medicine | Overall Mngt & Case Reports | Prevention | Prognosis | Psychosocial Aspects | Treatment 
About BrainLife
|
Children's Corner | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Newsletter | Patients & Caregivers | Search | Stem Cells | WHO Classification | SITEMAP