Treatment > Radiosurgery · Radiotherapy


38th ASCO Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL. May 18-21, 2002. Abstract No. 293 (Clinical Study)


Meeting Abstract

Is stereotactic radiotherapy adequate treatment for atypical and malignant meningiomas?

Simon S Lo, Kwan H Cho, Walter A Hall, Wilson L Hernandez, Kimberly K McCollow, Judy Unger

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Objective. To evaluate whether stereotactic radiotherapy alone is an adequate treatment for recurrent atypical and malignant meningiomas. 

Method. From 1992 to 2000, 10 patients with 16 recurrent atypical (A) or malignant (M) meningiomas (5 A and 11 M) were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). 
Patients with tumors greater than 4 cm or closer than 5 mm to the optic apparatus were chosen for FSRT. 
The SRS doses ranged from 1200 cGy at 50% to 4500 cGy at 50% and the FSRT doses ranged from 4500 cGy at 85% in 25 fractions to 5000 cGy at 90% in 20 fractions. 
A 2 mm margin was placed around the target as defined on the computerized tomography. 
The median follow-up ranged from 3 months to 66 months. 
Five patients had external beam radiation therapy to the same areas previously. 
All patients had radiologic follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging. 

Result. The 5-year actuarial tumor control was 31%. 
Five (50%) of the 10 patients developed recurrence. 
Two (40%) of the five patients who developed recurrence had disease recurring in the area outside the treated areas with no evidence of local recurrence. 
The time to recurrence ranged from 3 to 66 months. 
Three patients recurred after more than 3 years. 
The crude tumor shrinkage rate was 19%. 
The crude local progression rate was 31%. 

Conclusion. Our analysis showed that stereotactic therapy alone for the treatment of atypical and malignant meningiomas was associated with poor tumor control. 
The suboptimal local control and the propensity of A and M for regional recurrence warrant the investigation of more aggressive and innovative therapies. 
The potential long latency for tumor recurrence underscores the importance of long-term follow-up of these patients.

© Copyright 2002 American Society of Clinical Oncology

Source: http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002324-00_18-002002-00_19-00293-00_29-00A-00_42-00ONeill-00_43-00-00_44-00-00_45-00
Author-00_46-00Title-00_47-00Title-00_48-00and-00_49-00and,00.asp?cat=CNS+Tumors&parent=CENTRAL+NERVOUS+SYSTEM+TUMORS
&returnpid=2323


 

HOME | Detection | Diagnosis | Epidemiology | Etiology & Pathogenesis | Integrative Medicine | Overall Mngt & Case Reports | Prevention | Prognosis | Psychosocial Aspects | Treatment 
About BrainLife
|
Children's Corner | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Newsletter | Patients & Caregivers | Search | Stem Cells | WHO Classification | SITEMAP