|
|
Delay
in diagnosis of children with cancer: a retrospective study of 315 children
M. Weyl Ben
Arush, M. Haimi,
M. Peretz Nahum, H.F. Rennert,
K. Katz
Meyer Childrens Hospital,
Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Haifa, Israel [M.W.B.A., M.H., M.P.N.]. Carmel Medical Center,
Epidemiology, Haifa [H.F.R.]. Diagnostic Statistical Institute, Statistic,
Haifa [K.K.].
Objectives.
Cancer in children can be difficult to diagnose in the primary setting leading
to some delay in diagnosis.
Our aim was to determine the demographic and systemic parameters in children
with solid tumors and to ascertain which of them affected the delay in
diagnosis.
Methods.
Lag time was defined as the interval between onset of symptoms and final
diagnosis.
A retrospective study was performed on 315 children diagnosed with a solid tumor
between 1993-2001 at the Department of Hemato-Oncology at Rambam Medical
Center.
A questionnaire was completed for each child, including epidemiological, social
and medical issues concerning the family, the child, the medical system and the
tumor.
Lag time, including parent delay and physician delay, was estimated for each
case.
Results.
Mean lag time: 15.75 weeks, median: 7 weeks, range: 0-208 weeks.
Lowest mean values appeared in kidney tumors, highest values for epithelial
tumors, brain tumors and soft tissue sarcomas.
Mean parent delay: 4.42 weeks, median: 1 week, range: 0-130 weeks.
Mean physician delay: 11.17 weeks, median: 4 weeks, range: 0-206 weeks.
One-quarter of patients were diagnosed within 3 weeks, 50% within 7 weeks, and
75% within 15 weeks.
Multi-variant
analysis. Five factors were found to be strongly associated with lag time:
age of child (older children presented later), ethnic origin of father (greater
delay if he was Sephardic), family religion (greater delay in Jews), serial
number of the child in the family (greater diagnosis delay in families with one
child) and family place of residence (shorter diagnosis delay in the
village).
Among the demographic and personal parameters, the best predictors for diagnosis
delay were age of child and fathers ethnic origin.
Conclusions.
This work demonstrated that there are several factors influencing the diagnosis
delay of childhood solid tumors.
Recognizing these factors could minimize the diagnosis delay, hence improving
the chances of the child survive.
Source: http://ex2.excerptamedica.com/ciw-03ecco/abstracts/index.cfm?fuseaction=abs.prn&abstractID=640
|