|
|
Low-dose
chemotherapy in combination with COX-2 inhibitors and PPARgamma agonists in
recurrent high-grade glioma - a phase-II study
U.
Bogdahn, P. Hau, T. Jauch, U. Baumgart, O. Grauer, L. Kaes, H. Koch, C. Wismeth,
P. Krauseneck, A. Steinbrecher
University
of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Nervenklinik Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
Background.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) are overexpressed in about
50% of glioblastoma, possibly induce the expression of PTEN and have been shown
to suppress neoangiogenesis.
The expression of COX (cyclooxygenase)-2 inhibitors correlates positively with
tumor grade in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG).
Overexpression of COX-2 modulates immune responses, enhances proliferation and
migration of glioma in vitro.
COX-2 inhibitors induce apoptosis and prevent neoangiogenesis.
Low-dose chemotherapy inhibits neoangiogenesis in HGG by induction of apoptosis
in endothelial cells.
The combination of all three principles has been shown to induce a number of
important mechanisms preventing the progression of HGG.
Methods.
In this phase-II pilot trial, a combination regimen of Capecitabine (Xeloda) 2 x
1250 mg/m2 OD day 1-21 in 28 days, Pioglitazone (Actos) 60 mg OD and Refocoxib
(Vioxx) 25 mg OD is used.
Twenty patients with histologically proven HGG will be included in first or
second recurrence after standard therapy.
Primary endpoint is progression free survival, secondary endpoints are response
rate, overall survival, toxicity and quality of life.
Results.
As of end of november 2002, 7 patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have been
included.
One additional patient was excluded after reference histology (oligoastrocytoma
(OA) WHO grade II) and was treated as observation patient.
Toxicity was mild with palmaroplantar erythema (NCI-CTC grade III) in one
patient.
One patient with GBM and the observation patient had partial responses (PR)
lasting at least 8 weeks.
All other patients had tumor progression.
Discussion.
A combination therapy with capecitabine, pioglitazone and refocoxib did induce
objective responses in one patient with a slowly progressing GBM and one
additional observation patient with OA WHO grade II.
Therefore, we assume that this approach may be more feasible for slowly
progressing tumors, what would fit with the postulated mechanisms of the drugs
used.
A completion of our trial and further studies will be necessary to draw final
conclusions.
© Copyright 2003
American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights
reserved worldwide
Source: http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002489-00_18-002003-00_19-00103205-00_29-00A,00.asp?cat=CNS+Tumors&parent=
Central+Nervous+System+Tumors&returnpid=2325&SubCat_ID=4 |