BRAINLIFE Brain Tumor Medical Database

Treatment > Irinotecan


Neuro-Oncology, January 2004, Volume 6 Number 1, Pages 21 -- 27 (Clinical Study)


Abstract

Phase 2 study of weekly irinotecan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma: Final report of NABTT 97-11

Tracy T. Batchelor, Mark R. Gilbert, Jeffrey G. Supko, Kathryn A. Carson, Louis B. Nabors, Stuart A. Grossman, Glenn J. Lesser, Tom Mikkelsen, and Surasak Phuphanich for the NABTT CNS Consortium

Brain Tumor Center (T.T.B.) and Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology (J.G.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030 (M.R.G.); The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD 21231 (K.A.C., S.A.G.); Department of Neurology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294 (L.B.N.); Department of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 (G.J.L.); Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202 (T.M.); Division of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612 (S.P.); USA.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of patients exhibiting a radiographic response in a cohort of patients with recurrent malignant glioma who were treated with irinotecan. 
Secondary objectives were to determine progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. 
The trial was terminated after the first 18 patients were enrolled in this multicenter, 2-stage, phase 2 study. 
Twelve patients received concurrent enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, and 6 did not. 
Each cycle consisted of a 90-min i.v. infusion of irinotecan every week for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks off. 
One patient had a complete response, 5 patients had stable disease, 5 patients had radiographic progression, 6 patients were removed from the study because of toxicity, and 1 patient refused further therapy and was removed from the study. 
The response rate in this study was 6% (1/18), and 28% (5/18) of these patients progressed while receiving irinotecan. 
Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of diarrhea in 5 patients, neutropenia in 1 patient, infection in 1 patient, and respiratory failure in 1 patient. 
Irinotecan had minimal efficacy in this cohort of 18 patients with recurrent malignant glioma. 
Toxicity was significant but similar to that reported in other patient populations.

© 2003 Duke University Press

Source: http://juno.ingentaselect.com/cgi-bin/linker?ini=dup_no&reqidx=/cw/dup/15228517/v6n1/s4/p21


 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. HOMECURRENT NEURO-ONCOLOGYGLIOBLASTOMA REPORTSBRAIN TUMOR MEDICAL DATABASE SERVICES TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR GLIOBLASTOMA
DATABASE by Section: Classification | Diagnosis | Epidemiology | Etiology & Pathogenesis | Integrative Medicine | Overall Management | Prognosis | Psychosocial Aspects | Stem Cells | Treatment
DATABASE by Tumor: Glioblastoma | Medulloblastoma | Other TumorsSERVICES: About BrainLife | Children's Corner | Dedication | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Privacy Policy | Publications | Search | SiteMap
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here bottom