Overall Management > Mesenchymal, Non-Meningothelial Tumors


40th ASCO Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA. June 5-8, 2004. Abstract No.8513 (Clinical Study)


Meeting Abstract

Assessment of response to induction therapy and its influence on 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) in Group III rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS): Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-IV experience

P. P. Breitfeld, J. Anderson, S. Kao, D. Rodeberg, S. Qualman, S. Wolden, W. Meyer, Children's Oncology Group

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Childrens Hospital of Columbus, Columbus, OH; Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK

Background. Initial response to induction chemotherapy (CT) predicts FFS in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. 
Current European studies in RMS tailor therapy based on induction response. 
For IRS IV subjects with Group III RMS, we assessed whether reported response to induction therapy predicted FFS. 

Methods. We studied 453 Group III subjects who received induction CT, had response assessed at week 8 and continued with protocol therapy. 
Induction CT was followed by radiation therapy (RT) starting after week 9. 
Response to induction therapy was determined by radiographic measurement of tumor at weeks 0 and 8. 
Complete response (CR: complete resolution of disease), partial response (PR: ≥ 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the maximum perpendicular diameters of measurable lesions), no response (NR: < 50% decrease and < 25% increase), or progressive disease (>25% increase) was coded by local institutions. 

Results. Response rate at week 8 was 77% (CR=21%, PR=56%) but response had no influence on FFS (p=0.89). 
272 subjects received only CT during induction. 
Response rate was 81% (CR=22%, PR=59%) and was independent of histology and tumor size. 
In these subjects, response did not influence FFS except for those with alveolar histology. 
141 other subjects received CT and RT during induction, usually because of a parameningeal primary with intracranial extension. 
Response rate was 65% (CR=12%, PR=53%) but response had no influence on FFS. 
40 subjects received no RT at all (protocol violation) and response to induction CT had no effect on FFS. 

Conclusion. In IRS IV, response rate to induction therapy was 77% in Group III subjects but induction response had no influence on FFS overall. 

Table 1. Response rate and FFS by induction therapy and histology


N
CR
PR
NR
p-value for FFS


Rate
FFS
Rate
FFS
Rate
FFS

All
453
21%
75%
56%
71%
23%
77%
0.89
Induction CT
272
22%
81%
59%
72%
19%
84%
0.34
       Embryonal
185
21%
86%
60%
87%
19%
86%
0.96
       Alveolar
86
24%
71%
57%
39%
19%
81%
0.03
Induction CT and RT
141
12%
76%
53%
67%
35%
73%
0.70


Copyright 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved worldwide.

Source: http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002636-00_18-0026-00_19-001205,00.asp



 

HOME | Detection | Diagnosis | Epidemiology | Etiology & Pathogenesis | Integrative Medicine | Overall Mngt & Case Reports | Prevention | Prognosis | Psychosocial Aspects | Treatment 
About BrainLife
|
Children's Corner | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Newsletter | Patients & Caregivers | Search | Stem Cells | WHO Classification | SITEMAP