BRAINLIFE Brain Tumor Medical Database

Staging and Prognosis  


40th ASCO Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA. June 5-8, 2004. Abstract No.1560 (Clinical Study)


Meeting Abstract

Prognostic factors of oligodendrogliomas

M. Frenay, A. Ramaioli, D. Fontaine, V. Bourg, F. Vandenbos, C. Lebrun

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Hopital Pasteur, Nice, France

Background. Oligodendrogliomas (OG) have better prognosis than other glial tumors, maybe due to a better response to chemotherapy and molecular profile, as 1p/19q deletions. 

Methods. We evaluated 100 consecutive patients, representing 9% of patients with PBT in our database, with newly diagnosed OG from 1995 to 2002, in order to identifie prognostic factors. 
Three subgroups of patients were defined: group A: low grade (LOG) or grade II; group B: LOG with malignant transformation during the follow-up or Transformed AOG (TOG); group C: de novo anaplastic (AOG) or grade III. 
The prognostic significance of individual factors was evaluated by comparing the 2, 5 and 10-year survival rates. 

Results. Patients characteristics were: 66 men, 34 women; median follow-up: 4 years; mean age at the first symptom: 46 years; mean age at diagnosis: 46.7 years. 
The initial presenting symptom was: partial seizures, neurological deficit, headache or cognitive changes. 
Sixty patients had gadolinium enhancement (A: 15%, C: 90%). 
After histological diagnosis, symptomatic patients had a second line of treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy). 
Mean time for transformation for group B was 72 months with a median survival of 86 months (14 months after malignant transformation). 
Survivals at 2, 5 and 10 years were: A: 88%, 88%, 85%; B: 79%, 64%, 42%; C: 43%, 16%, 15% (p<0.0001). 
No difference in survival was observed between groups B and C after the diagnosis of malignant transformation (p=0.57). 
Using univariate analysis, age < 40years (p<0.0003), lack of contrast enhancement at diagnosis (p<0.00001) and epilepsy (p<0.007) were correlated with good prognosis. 
Complete surgery, compared partial resection or biopsy, did not influence survival time. 
In multivariate analysis, the strongest prognostic factor was lack of contrast enhancement (RR=3.4), followed by revealing symptom (RR=1.27) and age <40 years (RR=1.04). 
Relative risk for the grade II was age < 40years: 1.04; epilepsy: 1.6; enhancement: 2.66. 
For the grade III patients, only age remained significant (RR=1.02, p<0.03). 

Conclusions. OG have a good prognosis. 
Whatever the grade considered, contrast enhancement is the strongest prognostic factor.

Copyright 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved worldwide.

Source: http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002636-00_18-0026-00_19-00252,00.asp



 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. HOMEARCHIVES OF NEURO-ONCOLOGYCURRENT NEURO-ONCOLOGYGLIOBLASTOMA REPORTS
SERVICES: About BrainLife | Brain Tumor Medical Database | Children's Corner | Dedication | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Privacy Policy | Publications

This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here bottom