Treatment > Anticonvulsant Pathology


40th ASCO Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA. June 5-8, 2004. Abstract No.1525 (Clinical Study)


Meeting Abstract

Comparison of survival endpoints in glioblastoma patients receiving or not receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants in NCCTG Trials

K. A. Jaeckle, K. Ballman, J. Uhm, J. O'Fallon, P. Schomberg, B. Scheithauer, C. Giannini, P. J. Flynn, J. Buckner

Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Minneapolis, MN

Background. P450 enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIAC) reduce serum levels of chemotherapeutic agents metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2A6. 
Although decreased toxicity of chemotherapy (e.g, CPT-11) has been observed in EIAC vs. non-EIAC patients, effects on survival are less clear. 

Methods. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed on our last 3 completed prospective Phase II/III NCCTG trials (937252, 987251, and N0074; N=642) of newly-dx glioblastoma (GBM), to assess relationships between AC/EIAC treatment and overall- (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). 
Baseline seizure history was available on 1 of the 3 studies (N=93). 
OS was measured from surgery until death or last follow-up; PFS from time of study enrollment. 

Results. There were 463 AC-treated and 447 EIAC-treated patients. 
AC use was univariately positively associated with steroid use (p=0.003), age (p=0.005) and MMSE (p=0.028); extent of resection distributions also differed between patients on AC and those not (p=0.0001). 
OS- and PFS were independently associated with AC use (HR=0.75, p =0.0029, and HR=0.80, p=0.0023 respectively) in a multivariable Cox model, adjusting for age, steroid use, extent of resection, and MMSE. 
EIAC use (N=447) was also independently associated with OS and PFS (HR=0.75, p=0.0029 and HR=0.81, p=0.024, respectively). 
For patients on ACs, there was no difference in median OS between those with (9.2 mo) and without (13 mo) a history of seizures (p=0.12). 

Conclusions. We expected to find that patients on AC and EIAC might have shorter survivals, as a result of reduction in chemotherapy serum levels due to CYP3A4/2A6 induction. 
However, we paradoxically observed longer OS and PFS in patients receiving AC and EIAC. 
We also postulated that the need of AC/EIAC for treatment of seizures (a positive prognostic variable in prior Phase III trials) might select for biologically more indolent disease, but seizure history did not correlate with improved OS/PFS in a subset of our patients on ACs. 
These data suggest that AC and EIAC status at study entry should be considered as stratification variables in prospective clinical trials.

Copyright 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved worldwide.

Source: http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002636-00_18-0026-00_19-002917,00.asp


 

HOME | Detection | Diagnosis | Epidemiology | Etiology & Pathogenesis | Integrative Medicine | Overall Mngt & Case Reports | Prevention | Prognosis | Psychosocial Aspects | Treatment 
About BrainLife
|
Children's Corner | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Newsletter | Patients & Caregivers | Search | Stem Cells | WHO Classification | SITEMAP