Overall Management > Methodology | Psychosocial Aspects


40th ASCO Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA. June 5-8, 2004. Abstract No.8054 (Clinical Study)


Meeting Abstract

Application of the Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool (EFAT) in patients with brain metastases (BM) treated only with palliative radiotherapy (PRT)

S. Kahl, R. A. Sala, L. Mengelle, M. Alarcón, L. E. Fein

T.R. Cumbres and Pergamino Radiotherapy Institute, Rosario, Argentina; Hospital Escuela Eva Peron, Granadero Baigorria, Argentina; T.R. Cumbres S.A Radiotherapy Institute, Rosario, Argentina; Centro Estadístico, Rosario, Argentina; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina

Background. The EFAT is a validated tool to asses the functional status of cancer patients in palliative care, like Karnofsky index (KPS) and neurological function class (NFC) scales. 
BM are a frequent complication of cancer. 
Despite PRT plus corticoids mean overall survival does not exceed 6 months. 
At present, the evaluation of PRT impact in terms other than survival are scarce. 
To evaluate the impact of PRT in patients with BM, we applied EFAT and their results were compared with KPS and NFC (all performed before and after treatment). 

Methods. Between January 1997 and December 2002, 71 (of 122) patients with BM were treated only with PRT and corticoids. 
Wilcoxon, t-Student, χ² or Fisher tests were used as needed; P<0.01 was considered of statistical significance. 

Results. 37 women and 34 men (60.3 ± 1.3 years ± SE). 
Mean survival was 6.5 ± 0.6 months. 
KPS did not showed significant changes after PRT; however, NFC did (P=0.001). 
Mean EFAT score had a statistically significant improvement with PRT in patients with BM only (group 1), (P< 0.0001); but in patients with metastases in and outside CNS (group 2) (Table I) the score did not showed significance. 

Conclusions. Both EFAT and NFC showed statistical significance as a measure of positive impact of PRT in group 1. 
Moreover, EFAT best identified specific areas of benefit in both groups of patients probably allowing further treatment strategies. 
If proper symptom control could improve statistical significance in group 2 remains to be established. 

Table I. EFAT score of patients with BM and out of SNC metastases.

EFAT
Variables

In-CNS
(group 1. n=31)
In and Out-CNS
(group 2. n=40)
Total patients
(n=71)
Communication
P=0.0008
P=0.002
P<0.0001
Mental Alert
P=0.002
P=0.01
P=0.0001
Pain
NS
NS
NS
Respiratory Function
NS
NS
NS
Balance
P=0.0005
P=0.009
P<0.0001
Motility
P=0.0002
P=0.007
P<0.0001
Mobility
P=0.004
P=0.0008
P<0.0001
Activity level
NS
NS
NS
Motivation
NS
NS
P=0.01
Activities daily living
NS
P=0.007
P=0.001
TOTAL SCORE
P<0.001
NS
P<0.0001


Copyright 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved worldwide.

Source: http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002636-00_18-0026-00_19-002636,00.asp



 

HOME | Detection | Diagnosis | Epidemiology | Etiology & Pathogenesis | Integrative Medicine | Overall Mngt & Case Reports | Prevention | Prognosis | Psychosocial Aspects | Treatment 
About BrainLife
|
Children's Corner | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Newsletter | Patients & Caregivers | Search | Stem Cells | WHO Classification | SITEMAP