Etiology and PathogenesisMolecular Oncology  


40th ASCO Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA. June 5-8, 2004. Abstract No.8538 (Laboratory Investigation)


Meeting Abstract

Gene expression profiling of neuroblastoma: Analysis of nonmetastatic versus metastatic tumors

J. Mora, M. Alaminos, N.-K. Cheung, J. Rios, W. Gerald

Hospital Sant Joan de Deu de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro Nacional de Investigaciones oncologicas, Madrid, Spain; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Laboratori de Bioestadística i Epidemiologia, Barcelona, Spain

Background. Previously we reported a significant distinction in gene expression profile between neuroblastoma (NB) tumors and cell lines, and stroma-rich and stroma-poor NB tumors. 
Tumors clustered into 2 groups correlating with clinically defined prognostic groups of favorable and unfavorable tumors. 
In this study we analyzed tumors with and without clinically proved metastatic potential. 

Methods. We present the analysis of 25 locoregional and 27 stage 4 tumors all stroma poor and >1 year of age. 
Microarray analysis was carried out using Affymetrix Genechip Human Genome U95 SetTM with features for 63,175 gene/EST. 
To calculate the ability of individual genes to distinguish between sample groups we used 
1. Calculation of maximal variability and >3 standard deviation between groups and 
2. Step-down permutation and false discovery rate methods. 
For multivariate analysis, unsupervised methods like SOMS, PCA, K-nearest neighboring, and hierarchical clustering were applied. 

Results. By contrast analysis, 61out of 12,000 known annotated genes from chip A were differentially expressed in LR cases compared to stage 4. 
By permutation analysis only 3 out of the 12000 annotated genes showed statistical significance. 
Multivariate analysis showed a poor distinction between LR and stage 4 tumors with a third of samples classifying in the wrong groups. 
Classification models build to distinguish groups using support vector machines, k-nearest neighboring and log regression showed a cross validation accuracy that ranged from 76 to 89%. 

Conclusions. The gene expression profiles of tumors presenting as LR or disseminated disease suggest the existence of more than 2 groups of tumors. 
A "metastatic" gene expression profile could not be detected.

Copyright 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology All rights reserved worldwide.

Source: http://www.asco.org/ac/1,1003,_12-002636-00_18-0026-00_19-002046,00.asp



 

HOME | Detection | Diagnosis | Epidemiology | Etiology & Pathogenesis | Integrative Medicine | Overall Mngt & Case Reports | Prevention | Prognosis | Psychosocial Aspects | Treatment 
About BrainLife
| BL Newsletter |
Children's Corner | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Patients & Caregivers | Search | Stem Cells | WHO Classification | SITEMAP