|
Integrative Medicine
> Supplements
|
|
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 98, No. 14, 961-973, July 19,
2006;
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj263
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
Nutritional Interventions and Outcome
in Patients With Cancer or Preinvasive Lesions: Systematic Review
Anna A. Davies, George
Davey Smith, Roger Harbord, Geertruida E.
Bekkering, Jonathan A. C. Sterne, Rebecca
Beynon, Steven Thomas
Affiliations of authors: Department
of Social Medicine (AAD, GDS, RH, GEB, JACS, RB), Division of
Maxillofacial Surgery (ST), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Correspondence to: Steven Thomas, MD, PhD, Division of Maxillofacial
Surgery, University of Bristol, Lower Maudlin St., Bristol BS1 2LY,
U.K. (e-mail: steve.thomas{at}bristol.ac.uk ).
|
|
|
|
|
Background.
Dietary modifications and supplements are used widely by
patients with cancer and preinvasive lesions as an adjunct to
standard treatment.
Methods. We searched
electronic databases and reference lists to locate all
eligible trials and analyzed trial quality.
Outcome measures were all-cause and cancer
mortality, disease-free survival, cancer recurrence, second
primary cancer, recurrence of a preinvasive lesion, or
progression to cancer.
Results of individual trials were combined
by use of random-effects meta-analyses.
Results. We identified 59
eligible trials, 25 in patients with cancer and 34 in
patients with preinvasive lesions, respectively.
Trial quality was generally low; only
three trials (two of cancer and one of preinvasive lesions)
had adequate methods for generating the allocation sequence,
allocation concealment, and masking both outcome assessors and
participants.
The combined odds ratio (OR) for the
effect of a healthy diet—given alone or with dietary
supplements, weight loss, or exercise—on all-cause
mortality was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46 to
1.77).
There was no evidence of an
association between the use of antioxidant (OR = 1.01, 95%
CI = 0.88 to 1.15) or retinol (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.83 to
1.13) supplements and all-cause mortality.
Meta-analyses of all other
outcomes did not show clear evidence of benefit or
harm.
Conclusions. The impact
of most nutritional interventions cannot be reliably
estimated because of the limited number of trials, many of
which were of low quality.
There is no evidence that
dietary modification by cancer patients improves survival and
benefits disease prognosis.
|
|
|
|
|
© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford
University Press.
|
|
|
Abstract
|
Full
Text |
Reprint
|
News
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Referred |
|
|
to by
|
|
|
|
John A. Baron
(Nutritional) Chemoprevention of Cancer: What's Up?
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 98, No. 14, 945-946, July 19,
2006; DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj293
|
|
|
|