top
BRAINLIFE NEWSLETTER
Volume 4, Number 5 - 25 January 2005

Volume 4
Archive


1: Br J Cancer. 2005 Jan 18; [Epub ahead of print]
 
Survivin, Survivin-2B, and Survivin-deItaEx3 expression in medulloblastoma: biologic markers of tumour morphology and clinical outcome.

Fangusaro JR, Jiang Y, Holloway MP, Caldas H, Singh V, Boue DR, Hayes J, Altura RA.

[1] 1Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Columbus Children's Research Institute (CCRI), College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USA [2] 2Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Survivin is an apoptotic inhibitor that is expressed at high levels in a variety of malignancies. Survivin has four known alternative splice forms (Survivin, Survivin-2B, Survivin-deltaEx3, and Survivin-3B), and the recent literature suggests that these splice variants have unique functions and subcellular localisation patterns. We evaluated 19 fresh-frozen paediatric medulloblastomas for the expression of three Survivin isoforms by quantitative PCR. Survivin was most highly expressed when compared with normal cerebellar tissue. We also investigated Survivin protein expression in 40 paraffin-embedded paediatric medulloblastoma tumours by immunohistochemistry. We found a statistically significant association between the percentage of Survivin-positive cells and histologic subtype, with the large-cell-anaplastic variant expressing Survivin at higher levels than the classic subtype. We also found a statistically significant relationship between the percent of Survivin-positive cells in the tumours and clinical outcome, with higher levels of Survivin correlating with a worse prognosis. In summary, our study demonstrates a role for Survivin as a marker of tumour morphology and clinical outcome in medulloblastoma. Survivin may be a promising future prognostic tool and potential biologic target in this malignancy.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 18 January 2005; doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602317 www.bjcancer.com.

PMID: 15655550 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


 
2: Int J Cancer. 2005 Jan 20;113(3):379-85.
 
Frequent promoter hypermethylation and low expression of the MGMT gene in oligodendroglial tumors.

Mollemann M, Wolter M, Felsberg J, Collins VP, Reifenberger G.

Department of Neuropathology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Dusseldorf, Germany.

Allelic losses on the chromosome arms 1p and 19q have been associated with favorable response to chemotherapy and good prognosis in anaplastic oligodendroglioma patients, but the molecular mechanisms responsible for this relationship are as yet unknown. The DNA repair enzyme O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) may cause resistance to DNA-alkylating drugs commonly used in the treatment of anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and other malignant gliomas. We report on the analysis of 52 oligodendroglial tumors for MGMT promoter methylation, as well as mRNA and protein expression. Using sequencing of sodium bisulfite-modified DNA, we determined the methylation status of 25 CpG sites within the MGMT promoter. In 46 of 52 tumors (88%), we detected MGMT promoter hypermethylation as defined by methylation of more than 50% of the sequenced CpG sites. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR showed reduced MGMT mRNA levels relative to non-neoplastic brain tissue in the majority of tumors with hypermethylation. Similarly, immunohistochemical analysis showed either no or only small fractions of MGMT positive tumor cells. MGMT promoter hypermethylation was significantly more frequent and the percentage of methylated CpG sites in the investigated MGMT promoter fragment was significantly higher in tumors with loss of heterozygosity on chromosome arms 1p and 19q as compared to tumors without allelic losses on these chromosomes arms. Taken together, our data suggest that MGMT hypermethylation and low or absent expression are frequent in oligodendroglial tumors and likely contribute to the chemosensitivity of these tumors.

PMID: 15455350 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


 
3: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;76(2):296-8.
 
Acute aspiration pneumonia due to bulbar palsy: an initial manifestation of posterior fossa convexity meningioma.

Shenoy SN, Raja A.

Department of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, MANIPAL-576 119, UDUPI, Karnataka, India. shenoysn@yahoo.com.

PMID: 15654062 [PubMed - in process]


 
4: J Nucl Med. 2005 Jan;46(1 Suppl):151S-6S.
 
Current status of therapy of solid tumors: brain tumor therapy.

Zalutsky MR.

Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Treatment of malignant brain tumors with conventional approaches is largely unsuccessful because curative doses generally cannot be delivered without excessive toxicity to normal brain. Radioimmunotherapy is emerging as an attractive alternative for glioma therapy because of the potential for more selectively irradiating tumor cells while sparing normal tissues. Several institutions are engaged in phase I and phase II trials investigating the therapeutic potential of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) labeled with the beta-emitters (131)I and (90)Y and the alpha-emitter (211)At in patients with recurrent and newly diagnosed brain tumors. The current status of these trials will be discussed with regard to efficacy, toxicity, and future directions.

PMID: 15653663 [PubMed - in process]


5: J Clin Oncol. 2004 Dec 1;22(23):4727-34.
 
Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan plus carmustine in glioblastoma recurrent or progressive after first-line temozolomide chemotherapy: a phase II study of the Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO).

Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Basso U, Reni M, Valduga F, Monfardini S, Amista P, Nicolardi L, Sotti G, Ermani M.

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy. aabrandes@unipd.it

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most frequent brain tumor in adults, is not considered chemosensitive. Nevertheless, there is widespread use of first-line chemotherapy, often with temozolomide, as a therapeutic option in patients with progressive disease after surgery and radiotherapy. However, at the time of second recurrence and/or progression, active and noncross-resistant chemotherapy regimens are required. The aim of the present multicenter phase II trial, therefore, was to ascertain the efficacy of second-line carmustine (BCNU) and irinotecan chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed GBM, recurring or progressing after surgery, standard radiotherapy and a first-line temozolomide-based chemotherapy, were considered eligible. The primary end-point was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6), and secondary end-points included response rate, toxicity, and survival. All patients were on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic prophylaxis. Chemotherapy consisted of BCNU (100 mg/m2 on day 1) plus irinotecan (175 mg/m2/weekly for 4 weeks), every 6 weeks, for a maximum of eight cycles. In the absence of grade 2 toxicity, the irinotecan dose was increased to 200 mg/m2. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (median age, 53.4 years; median Karnofsky performance status, 80; range, 60 to 90) were included in the study. PFS-6 was 30.3% (95% CI, 18.5% to 49.7%). Median time to progression was 17 weeks (95% CI, 11.9 to 23.9). Nine partial responses (21.4%; 95% CI, 9% to 34%) were obtained. Toxicity was manageable. CONCLUSION: The BCNU plus irinotecan regimen seems active and non-cross-resistant in patients with GBM with recurrence after temozolomide-based chemotherapy.

Publication Types:
  • Clinical Trial
  • Clinical Trial, Phase II
  • Multicenter Study

PMID: 15570079 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
6: Oncology. 2004;67(2):174-8.
 
Brain metastasis responding to gefitinib alone.

Poon AN, Ho SS, Yeo W, Mok TS.

Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

A woman with stage IIIb non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) developed disease progression with brain metastases during chemotherapy. Due to unusual circumstances, the patient received gefitinib alone, without the use of corticosteroid treatment or radiotherapy. There was a dramatic clinical improvement within 1 week. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging of the brain 1 month later showed decreases in both the size and number of brain metastases. The patient remains well 9 months after initiation of gefitinib. It is proposed that gefitinib may have a role in treatment of brain metastases from NSCLC. 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Publication Types:
  • Case Reports
  • Review
  • Review of Reported Cases

PMID: 15539923 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
7: Nature. 2004 Nov 18;432(7015):281-2.

Comment on:  
Neurobiology: at the root of brain cancer.

Clarke MF.

Publication Types:
  • Comment
  • News

PMID: 15549078 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
8: No Shinkei Geka. 2004 Aug;32(8):827-34.

[Cancer stem cells in pediatric brain tumors]

[Article in Japanese]

Nakano I, Hemmati HD, Kornblum HI.

Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. inakano@mednet.ucla.edu

Cancers are formed by heterogeneous cell types from immature highly proliferative cells to lineage-committed differentiated cells. Transplantation studies have suggested the existence of "cancer stem cells", individual cells capable of producing an entire tumor. Recent advances in stem cell research have allowed for the demonstration of the existence of cancer stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia, breast cancer, and, most recently, in pediatric brain tumors. Each of these has some similarities with the normal stem cells in the corresponding organs. For example, leukemia stem cells express some, but not all, markers of hematopoietic stem cells. Regarding pediatric brain tumors, putative cancer stem cells were identified from medulloblastoma and also from glioma. These tumor-derived cells self-renew under clonal conditions, and differentiate into neurons and glia as well as into abnormal cells with mixed phenotypes. Interestingly, the tumor stem/progenitors, enriched in culture, maintained proliferation after 4 weeks from transplantation into neonatal rat brain. In this review, we discuss the difference as well as the similarity between tumor and normal stem cells, and also the possible clinical implication of cancer stem cells.

Publication Types:
  • Review
  • Review, Tutorial

PMID: 15478649 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 
9: Neurosurgery. 2004 Oct;55(4):977-8.
 
Possible oncogenicity of subventricular zone neural stem cells: case report.

Uchida K, Mukai M, Okano H, Kawase T.

Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

OBJECTIVE: The origin of brain tumors has attracted much controversy. Recent advances in neural stem cell biology coupled with the new concepts of central nervous system development have raised interesting possibilities regarding the oncogenic properties of neural stem/progenitor cells. To elucidate these putative properties further, the clinical materials from an infant brain tumor were analyzed, focusing on the relation with the neural stem/progenitor cells. METHODS: The expression of neural stem/progenitor cell markers in the tumor cells and the cellular components of the infant brain tumor were examined using immunohistochemistry. The tumor cell biology was analyzed both in culture and in the grafted brain environment. RESULTS: Three main bodies of evidence were demonstrated indicating that the tumor was of possible subventricular zone postnatal or adult normal neural stem cell origin. First, in the tumor specimen we demonstrated the strong positive expression of the neural stem/progenitor cell markers, nestin and Musashi-1. Second, immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of neuronal, astrocytic, and immature precursor cells in the tumor tissue, similar to the cellular components of the subventricular zone, thereby pointing to the subventricular zone as the possible origin of the tumor. The subventricular zone also is one of the strong candidates for the location of postnatal/adult neural stem cells. This cellular evidence was strengthened further by the clinicoradiological findings that demonstrated the involvement of the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricle by the tumor. Third, in the in vitro and in vivo experiments, a dynamic shift in expression patterns between neural stem cells (nestin, Musashi-1) and differentiated cells (glial fibrillary acidic protein, neuron-specific Class III beta-tubulin) markers was seen, similar to the proposed behavior of postnatal/adult neural stem cells in situ. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that this brain tumor originated from neural stem cells located in the subventricular zone, and the further possibility of the general oncogenic potential of neural stem cells.

PMID: 15458607 [PubMed - in process]

 
10: Orv Hetil. 2004 Jun 20;145(25):1307-13.

[Embryonic stem cell therapy in experimental stroke: host-dependent malignant transformation]

[Article in Hungarian]

Erdo F, Trapp T, Buhrle C, Fleischmann B, Hossmann KA.

Experimentelle Neurologie, Max-Planck Institut fur neurologische Forschung, Koln, Nemetorszag. franciska.erdo@idri.hu

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic application of embryonic stem cells in neurodegenerative disorders like stroke is widely investigated in preclinical animal models. AIM: The authors studied the therapeutic potential of murine embryonic stem cells in two rodent models of stroke. METHODS: Undifferentiated and predifferentiated stem cells were implanted into the non-ischemic hemisphere of mice and rats following focal brain ischemia. The brains were analysed by immunohistochemistry and histology. The in vitro differentiation of the cells was checked by immunocytochemistry and Western-blot. RESULTS: After xenotransplantation in rats undifferentiated cells migrated along the corpus callosum towards the ischemic injury. Later stem cells differentiated into neurons in the border zone of the lesion. In the homologous mouse brain, the same murine embryonic stem cells did not migrate, but produced highly malignant teratocarcinomas at the site of implantation, independent of whether they were predifferentiated in vitro to neural progenitor cells. These experiments demonstrated a hitherto unrecognized adverse outcome after xenotransplantation and homologous transplantation of embryonic stem cells. CONCLUSION: This observation raises serious concerns about safety provisions when the therapeutic potential of human embryonic stem cells is tested in preclinical animal models. The clinical trials are based on the positive outcome of the xenologous experiments.

PMID: 15285148 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
 

HOME | Detection | Diagnosis | Epidemiology | Etiology & Pathogenesis | Integrative Medicine | Overall Mngt & Case Reports | Prevention | Prognosis | Psychosocial Aspects | Treatment 
About BrainLife
|
Children's Corner | E-mail Alerts | Journals | Newsletter | Patients & Caregivers | Search | Stem Cells | WHO Classification | SITEMAP