|
|
|
|
|
Neuro-Oncology
Reviews
|
|
|
|
Volume
28 Number 26 - Special issue*
31 October 2026
|
|
|
|
Home
>
Publications
>
Neuro-Oncology
Reviews >
Volume
28, Year 2026 >
Number 26, 31 October
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
effects of radiotherapy on postoperative
glioblastoma progression and recurrence. Educational
annotated bibliography
|
|
Radiotherapy
has two simultaneous biological consequences: it reduces tumour
burden, while creating selective and environmental pressures that
influence the residual disease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
A.
Clinical foundations: efficacy and treatment resistance.
Evidence for surgery plus radiotherapy versus surgery alone.
|
|
|
|
Frankel SA, German WJ.
Glioblastoma
multiforme; review of 219 cases with regard to natural history,
pathology, diagnostic methods, and treatment.
J
Neurosurg. 1958 Sep;15(5):489-503. doi:
10.3171/jns.1958.15.5.0489. PMID:
13576192. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A major historical retrospective series examining 219
patients with glioblastoma treated between 1924 and 1952. The
study is particularly relevant to the early clinical evaluation of
surgical treatment, including the relationship between extensive
resection, partial resection and external decompression and
subsequent survival. Its historical importance lies in the early
recognition of the prognostic relevance of the extent of surgical
intervention. However, retrospective design, selection bias,
differences in tumour operability and the absence of modern
diagnostic and molecular classification prevent a causal
interpretation of the survival differences.
Early use of
radiotherapy on 47 patients.
|
|
|
|
Edland RW, Javid M, Ansfield FJ.
Glioblastoma
multiforme. An analysis of the results of postoperative
radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy and concomitant
5-fluorouracil. (A prospective randomized study of 32 cases).
Am
J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1971
Feb;111(2):337-42. doi:
10.2214/ajr.111.2.337. PMID:
5100220. Randomized Clinical Trial. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Design:
Prospective randomized study, 32 patients.
Comparison:
Postoperative radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy combined with
5- fluorouracil (5-FU).
Contribution: One of the early
attempts to improve the efficacy of radiation through
pharmacological radiosensitization.
Critical assessment:
Very small sample; the study cannot establish a reliable survival
advantage from adding 5-FU. Its importance is primarily
historical.
|
|
|
|
Andersen AP.
Postoperative irradiation
of glioblastomas. Results in a randomized series.
Acta
Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Biol. 1978 Jan;17(6):475-84.
doi:
10.3109/02841867809128178. PMID:
216238. Randomized Clinical Trial. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Design:
Randomized study of 108 patients with glioblastoma, comparing
surgery alone with surgery followed by postoperative radiotherapy.
This is the closest match to the question because the comparison
was specifically between the two treatment strategies.
Finding:
The study reported a survival advantage for postoperative
irradiation. It is a particularly important historical reference
because it directly addresses whether surgery alone is
sufficient.
Critical limitation: The trial is old, predates
modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), molecular classification
and contemporary radiotherapy, and is small by current standards.
Its results should be interpreted in their historical context.
|
|
|
|
Walker MD, Alexander E Jr, Hunt WE, MacCarty CS, Mahaley MS Jr,
Mealey J Jr, Norrell HA, Owens G, Ransohoff J, Wilson CB, Gehan
EA, Strike TA.
Evaluation of BCNU
and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A
cooperative clinical trial.
J
Neurosurg. 1978 Sep;49(3):333-43. doi:
10.3171/jns.1978.49.3.0333. PMID:
355604. Randomized Clinical Trial. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Design:
Prospective randomized study of 303 patients with anaplastic
gliomas, approximately 90% of whom had glioblastoma in the
historical classification.
Results: In the evaluable
population, median survival was reported as approximately 35–
37.5 weeks with radiotherapy-containing treatment, compared with
14 weeks with conventional supportive care. Radiotherapy alone
also outperformed chemotherapy alone.
Critical limitation:
The control group received supportive care rather than a uniformly
defined modern surgery-alone protocol. The study nevertheless
provides important randomized evidence that postoperative
radiotherapy materially improves survival.
|
|
|
|
Walker MD, Green SB, Byar DP, Alexander E Jr, Batzdorf U, Brooks
WH, Hunt WE, MacCarty CS, Mahaley MS Jr, Mealey J Jr, Owens G,
Ransohoff J 2nd, Robertson JT, Shapiro WR, Smith KR Jr, Wilson CB,
Strike TA.
Randomized comparisons of
radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant
glioma after surgery.
N
Engl J Med. 1980 Dec 4;303(23):1323-9. doi:
10.1056/NEJM198012043032303. PMID:
7001230. Randomized Clinical Trial. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Design:
Randomized trial of 467 patients with histologically confirmed
malignant glioma after surgery.
Results:
Radiotherapy-containing treatment arms demonstrated a survival
advantage over semustine alone. The study helped establish
radiotherapy as a central component of postoperative
treatment.
Critical limitation: This was not a pure
surgery-alone comparison, and the histological categories do not
map perfectly onto today's molecular definition of glioblastoma.
|
|
|
|
Kristiansen K, Hagen S, Kollevold T, Torvik A, Holme I, Nesbakken
R, Hatlevoll R, Lindgren M, Brun A, Lindgren S, Notter G, Andersen
AP, Elgen K.
Combined modality therapy
of operated astrocytomas grade III and IV. Confirmation of the
value of postoperative irradiation and lack of potentiation of
bleomycin on survival time: a prospective multicenter trial of the
Scandinavian Glioblastoma Study Group.
Cancer.
1981 Feb 15;47(4):649-52. doi:
10.1002/1097-0142(19810215)47:4<649::aid-cncr2820470405>3.0.co;2-w.
PMID:
6164465. Randomized Clinical Trial. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Design:
Prospective multicentre randomized study of 118 patients with
grade III or IV astrocytomas.
Results: Median survival with
radiotherapy was approximately 10.2 months, compared with 5.2
months with supportive care. Adding bleomycin did not
significantly improve survival over radiotherapy alone.
Critical
limitation: The population included different tumour grades, and
the control was supportive care rather than surgery alone. It
reinforces the radiotherapy effect but is not an exact two-arm
comparison of the question posed.
|
|
|
|
Stupp R,
Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ,
Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer
RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG,
Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research
and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups;
National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Radiotherapy
plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma.
N
Engl J Med.
2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96. doi:
10.1056/NEJMoa043330. PMID:
15758009. EORTC
trial 22981/26981 /
NCIC
trial CE.3. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
The landmark EORTC-NCIC trial established the survival
benefit of adding concomitant and adjuvant TMZ to radiotherapy. It
provides the essential clinical baseline for any discussion of the
adverse biological effects of radiation: possible treatment
associated resistance must be evaluated against the demonstrated
net benefit of the treatment regimen. Because radiation and TMZ
were combined, the trial does not isolate radiation-specific
molecular effects.
|
|
|
|
Keime-Guibert F, Chinot O, Taillandier L, Cartalat-Carel S, Frenay
M, Kantor G, Guillamo JS, Jadaud E, Colin P, Bondiau PY, Meneï
P, Loiseau H, Bernier V, Honnorat J, Barrié M, Mokhtari K,
Mazeron JJ, Bissery A, Delattre JY; Association of French-Speaking
Neuro-Oncologists.
Radiotherapy for
glioblastoma in the elderly.
N
Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1527-35. doi:
10.1056/NEJMoa065901. PMID:
17429084. Trial
Registration ID: NCT00430911. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Design:
Randomized trial comparing radiotherapy plus supportive care with
supportive care alone in patients aged 70 years or older. The
final glioblastoma analysis included 81 patients.
Results:
Median survival was 29.1 weeks with radiotherapy versus 16.9 weeks
with supportive care. The hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.47
(95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29–0.76; 𝑃 =
0.002P=0.002).
Critical limitation: The comparator was
supportive care, not surgery alone. Nevertheless, the trial
demonstrated that radiotherapy can provide a survival benefit even
in older patients.
|
|
|
|
Stupp
R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC,
Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, Hau P, Brandes AA,
Gijtenbeek J, Marosi C, Vecht CJ, Mokhtari K, Wesseling P, Villa
S, Eisenhauer E, Gorlia T, Weller M, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG,
Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of
Cancer Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups; National Cancer
Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Effects
of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus
radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised
phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.
Lancet
Oncol.
2009 Mar 9. 2009;10(5):459-66. doi:
10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7. PMID:
19269895. Trial
Registration ID:
NCT00006353. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
The five-year analysis confirmed the durable survival
benefit of combined treatment, although long-term survivors
remained a minority. The retrospective analysis of MGMT promoter
methylation also established its importance as a predictor of
benefit from alkylating chemotherapy. The paper is relevant when
interpreting recurrence after standard treatment, but it does not
establish whether radiation itself induces an aggressive recurrent
phenotype.
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
Experimental evidence: stem-like cells and radioresistance.
|
|
|
|
Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y,
Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, Dewhirst MW, Bigner DD, Rich JN.
Glioma
stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of
the DNA damage response.
Nature.
2006 Oct 18. 2006;444(7120):756-60. doi:
10.1038/nature05236. PMID:
17051156. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A foundational study demonstrating preferential activation
of DNA-damage checkpoints and more effective repair of
radiation-induced damage in CD133-positive glioma cells. The
authors also reported enrichment of these cells after irradiation
and showed that checkpoint inhibition could reverse aspects of
their radioresistance. The findings support a mechanism by which
treatment selects or preserves tumour-propagating cells.
Limitations include reliance on particular stem-cell markers and
experimental models; CD133 expression alone does not define all
tumour-propagating cells.
|
|
|
|
Kaur B, Khwaja FW, Severson EA, Matheny SL, Brat DJ, Van Meir EG.
Hypoxia and the
hypoxia-inducible-factor pathway in glioma growth and
angiogenesis.
Neuro
Oncol. 2005 Apr 1;7(2):134-53. doi:
10.1215/S1152851704001115. PMID:
15831232. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A useful background reference for understanding how hypoxia,
vascular abnormalities and hypoxia-inducible signalling contribute
to glioma biology. Hypoxia is particularly relevant because it can
reduce radiation effectiveness while activating adaptive survival
pathways. This paper is not a direct demonstration that
radiotherapy-induced hypoxia causes recurrence; it provides
biological context for that hypothesis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
Radiation-associated changes in the tumour microenvironment
|
|
|
|
Barker HE, Paget JT, Khan AA, Harrington KJ.
The
tumour microenvironment after radiotherapy: mechanisms of
resistance and recurrence.
Nat
Rev Cancer. 2015 Jun 2415(7):409-25. doi:
10.1038/nrc3958. PMID:
26105538. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
An
important conceptual framework for understanding radiation as both
a cytotoxic intervention and a modifier of the tumour
microenvironment. It examines hypoxia, vascular changes,
inflammatory signalling and other mechanisms that may influence
posttreatment tumour behaviour. Its breadth makes it useful for
identifying hypotheses, but not every mechanism discussed is
directly established in glioblastoma.
|
|
|
|
Gupta K, Burns TC.
Radiation-Induced
Alterations in the Recurrent Glioblastoma Microenvironment:
Therapeutic Implications.
Front
Oncol. 2018 Nov 8;8:503. doi:
10.3389/fonc.2018.00503. PMID:
30467536. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Particularly relevant to the present topic. It discusses how
prior irradiation may produce persistent changes in extracellular
matrix composition, vascular function, hypoxia, innate immune
responses and cellular senescence. It proposes that some injury
associated responses could provide a permissive environment for
recurrent tumour growth. The authors appropriately frame many of
these effects as mechanisms requiring further investigation,
rather than established causes of clinical recurrence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.
Contemporary spatial and translational evidence
|
|
|
|
Watson SS, Duc B, Kang Z, de Tonnac A, Eling N, Font L, Whitmarsh
T, Massara M; iMAXT Consortium; Bodenmiller B, Hausser J, Joyce
JA.
Microenvironmental reorganization
in brain tumors following radiotherapy and recurrence revealed by
hyperplexed immunofluorescence imaging.
Nat
Commun. 2024 Apr 15;15(1):3226. doi:
10.1038/s41467-024-47185-9. PMID:
38622132. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This study uses high-dimensional spatial imaging to
investigate radiation associated changes in immune-cell
populations and tissue architecture in a preclinical glioblastoma
model, including changes observed after treatment and during
tumour regrowth. It is particularly valuable because it examines
cellular organisation and interactions rather than relying
exclusively on bulk gene-expression measurements. The observed
treatment-associated changes provide a basis for mechanistic
investigation, but a mouse model cannot establish the magnitude or
causal importance of these processes in human recurrent
glioblastoma.
|
|
|
|
Rahman R, Shi DD, Reitman ZJ, Hamerlik P, de Groot JF, Haas-Kogan
DA, D'Andrea AD, Sulman EP, Tanner K, Agar NYR, Sarkaria JN,
Tinkle CL, Bindra RS, Mehta MP, Wen PY.
DNA
damage response in brain tumors: A Society for Neuro-Oncology
consensus review on mechanisms and translational efforts in
neuro-oncology.
Neuro
Oncol. 2024 Mar 22;26(8):1367-1387. doi:
10.1093/neuonc/noae072. PMID:
38770568. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A
useful synthesis of DNA-damage response pathways and their
therapeutic implications in brain tumours, including glioblastoma.
It places radiation resistance in the wider context of DNA repair,
treatment combinations, biomarker development and translational
drug development. It is especially helpful for identifying
candidate pathways for radiosensitisation, while highlighting the
gap between promising laboratory findings and successful clinical
translation.
|
|
|
|
Debbi K, Loganadane G, To N, Cherif MA, Boukhobza C, Rida H,
Grellier N, Mammar H, Belkacemi Y.
New
approaches to overcome radioresistance in glioblastoma:
mechanisms, targets and role of innovative therapies, new
particles and non-photon radiotherapy in 2024. A systematic
review.
Rep
Pract Oncol Radiother. 2025 Apr 18;30(2):269-281. doi:
10.5603/rpor.105654. PMID:
40635989. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A broad review of approaches intended to overcome
glioblastoma radioresistance, including DNA-damage response
targets, hypoxia-related mechanisms and alternative radiation
modalities. It is useful for extending the bibliography towards
translational interventions. The existence of a plausible
radiosensitising mechanism, however, should not be equated with
clinical efficacy; results from different models, radiation
schedules and combination regimens must be assessed separately.
|
|
|
|
Sarrazin E, Valable S, Pérès EA, Colloc'h N, Emery
E, Lesueur P, Leclerc A, Bernaudin M, Aury-Landas J.
Glioblastoma
and resistance to radiotherapy: role of cancer stem cells
subpopulations, hypoxia and therapeutic strategies.
Cancer
Treat Rev. 2026 Aug 1;149:103198. doi:
10.1016/j.ctrv.2026.103198. PMID:
42659714. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A recent synthesis focused on the interactions between
glioma stem-like cell states, hypoxia and radiation resistance.
Its emphasis on cellular-state transitions is relevant to the
distinction between selection of pre-existing resistant cells and
treatmentassociated adaptation. As a review, it should be used to
identify and trace primary studies rather than as a substitute for
evaluating the underlying experiments individually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
Selection versus induction in recurrent glioblastoma:
pre-existing resistant clones or radiation-induced cellular
states?
|
|
|
|
A.
Experimental foundations: radioresistance and
cellular-state transitions
|
|
|
|
Bao
S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, Dewhirst MW,
Bigner DD, Rich JN.
Glioma
stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of
the DNA damage response.
Nature.
2006 Oct 18. 2006;444(7120):756-60. doi:
10.1038/nature05236. PMID:
17051156.
ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A foundational investigation demonstrating preferential
activation of DNAdamage checkpoint responses in glioma stem-like
cells following irradiation. The study provides evidence for
differential survival of pre-existing cell populations and
supports the hypothesis that cells with stem-like properties
contribute to radioresistance. It is primarily evidence for
selection and intrinsic resistance, rather than definitive proof
that radiation induces a new resistant lineage. Its reliance on
particular markers and experimental models limits direct
extrapolation to the diversity of human glioblastoma.
|
|
|
|
Bhat KPL, Balasubramaniyan V, Vaillant B, Ezhilarasan R, Hummelink
K, Hollingsworth F, Wani K, Heathcock L, James JD, Goodman LD,
Conroy S, Long L, Lelic N, Wang S, Gumin J, Raj D, Kodama Y,
Raghunathan A, Olar A, Joshi K, Pelloski CE, Heimberger A, Kim SH,
Cahill DP, Rao G, Den Dunnen WFA, Boddeke HWGM, Phillips HS,
Nakano I, Lang FF, Colman H, Sulman EP, Aldape K.
Mesenchymal
differentiation mediated by NF-κB promotes radiation
resistance in glioblastoma.
Cancer
Cell. 2013 Aug 29;24(3):331-46. doi:
10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.001. PMID:
23993863. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
One of the most relevant primary studies for the induction
hypothesis. The authors demonstrated that a subset of proneural
glioma stem-like cultures could acquire mesenchymal
characteristics through TNF-α/NF-κB-dependent
signalling, accompanied by a more radioresistant phenotype. The
work also connected macrophage/microglial signals with mesenchymal
differentiation. Its principal strength is the functional
investigation of a candidate transition mechanism. However, the
findings do not establish that radiation alone induces this
transition in human tumours or that the mechanism dominates
recurrence clinically.
|
|
|
|
Neftel
C, Laffy J, Filbin MG, Hara T, Shore ME, Rahme GJ, Richman AR,
Silverbush D, Shaw ML, Hebert CM, Dewitt J, Gritsch S, Perez EM,
Gonzalez Castro LN, Lan X, Druck N, Rodman C, Dionne D, Kaplan A,
Bertalan MS, Small J, Pelton K, Becker S, Bonal D, Nguyen QD,
Servis RL, Fung JM, Mylvaganam R, Mayr L, Gojo J, Haberler C,
Geyeregger R, Czech T, Slavc I, Nahed BV, Curry WT, Carter BS,
Wakimoto H, Brastianos PK, Batchelor TT, Stemmer-Rachamimov A,
Martinez-Lage M, Frosch MP, Stamenkovic I, Riggi N, Rheinbay E,
Monje M, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Cahill DP, Patel AP, Hunter T, Verma
IM, Ligon KL, Louis DN, Regev A, Bernstein BE, Tirosh I, Suvà
ML.
An
Integrative Model of Cellular States, Plasticity, and Genetics for
Glioblastoma.
Cell.
2019 Jul 18;178(4):835-849.e21.
doi:
10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.024.
PMID:
31327527.
ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A major framework for understanding glioblastoma as a
heterogeneous population of malignant cells occupying different,
partially plastic transcriptional states. The study shows how
genetic alterations and environmental influences shape the
distribution of these states. It is essential for interpreting
recurrence because it demonstrates why a change in phenotype need
not imply a new genetic clone. It is not, however, a direct
demonstration of radiation-induced state conversion in patients.
|
|
|
|
Dirkse A, Golebiewska A, Buder T, Nazarov PV, Muller A,
Poovathingal S, Brons NHC, Leite S, Sauvageot N, Sarkisjan D,
Seyfrid M, Fritah S, Stieber D, Michelucci A, Hertel F,
Herold-Mende C, Azuaje F, Skupin A, Bjerkvig R, Deutsch A,
Voss-Böhme A, Niclou SP.
Stem
cell-associated heterogeneity in Glioblastoma results from
intrinsic tumor plasticity shaped by the microenvironment.
Nat
Commun. 2019 Apr 16;10(1):1787. doi:
10.1038/s41467-019-09853-z. PMID:
30992437. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Particularly important for distinguishing a stable,
intrinsically resistant subpopulation from a reversible phenotype.
The study found that cells expressing stemcell-associated markers
could alter their phenotype in response to environmental
conditions, with multiple populations capable of contributing to
tumour growth. This challenges a rigid hierarchical model in which
only a permanently defined stem-cell compartment can regenerate
the tumour. The experiments do not establish that radiation is the
principal driver of the observed plasticity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Genetic selection and clonal evolution
|
|
|
|
Johnson BE, Mazor T, Hong C, Barnes M, Aihara K, McLean CY, Fouse
SD, Yamamoto S, Ueda H, Tatsuno K, Asthana S, Jalbert LE, Nelson
SJ, Bollen AW, Gustafson WC, Charron E, Weiss WA, Smirnov IV, Song
JS, Olshen AB, Cha S, Zhao Y, Moore RA, Mungall AJ, Jones SJM,
Hirst M, Marra MA, Saito N, Aburatani H, Mukasa A, Berger MS,
Chang SM, Taylor BS, Costello JF.
Mutational
analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of
recurrent glioma.
Science.
2013 Dec 12;343(6167):189-193. doi:
10.1126/science.1239947. PMID:
24336570. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
An important study of evolutionary relationships between
initial and recurrent gliomas. It demonstrated that recurrent
tumours may emerge from early-diverging populations and that TMZ
exposure can be associated with hypermutation and therapy related
mutational signatures. The cohort included lower-grade gliomas
that progressed, rather than exclusively adult-type glioblastomas;
it is therefore best used as a conceptual and comparative
reference for clonal evolution. Its findings support the need to
distinguish pre-existing clones from treatment-associated
mutagenesis, but they do not establish radiation-specific
causality.
|
|
|
|
Al-Holou WN, Wang H, Ravikumar V, Shankar S, Oneka M, Fehmi Z,
Verhaak RG, Kim H, Pratt D, Camelo-Piragua S, Speers C, Wahl DR,
Hollon T, Sagher O, Heth JA, Muraszko KM, Lawrence TS, de Carvalho
AC, Mikkelsen T, Rao A, Rehemtulla A.
Subclonal
evolution and expansion of spatially distinct THY1-positive cells
is associated with recurrence in glioblastoma.
Neoplasia.
2023 Jan 6;36:100872. doi:
10.1016/j.neo.2022.100872. PMID:
36621024. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Particularly strong evidence for a selection-based
mechanism. The authors identified THY1-positive
mesenchymal/stem-like cells in untreated glioblastoma,
demonstrated relative resistance to chemoradiotherapy in
experimental models, and observed marked enrichment of this
population at recurrence. Their experiments also implicated
transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signalling in
maintaining the associated phenotype and resistance. The findings
support the expansion of pre-existing resistant cells, potentially
from spatially restricted niches. Nevertheless, the combined use
of radiation and TMZ prevents clean attribution to either
treatment, and enrichment does not exclude additional state
transitions during recurrence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
Human longitudinal single-cell evidence
|
|
|
|
Wang L, Jung J, Babikir H, Shamardani K, Jain S, Feng X, Gupta N,
Rosi S, Chang S, Raleigh D, Solomon D, Phillips JJ, Diaz AA.
A
single-cell atlas of glioblastoma evolution under therapy reveals
cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic therapeutic targets.
Nat
Cancer. 2022 Dec 20;3(12):1534-1552. doi:
10.1038/s43018-022-00475-x. PMID:
36539501. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A key study of matched primary and recurrent glioblastomas,
combining single nucleus RNA sequencing, chromatin analysis, DNA
sequencing and spatial approaches. The investigators reported a
shift towards mesenchymal-like states at recurrence and identified
signalling relationships between malignant cells and their
microenvironment. Crucially, the observed shift could reflect
selection of pre-existing mesenchymal cells, induction of a
mesenchymal programme in other cells, or differential
proliferation. This makes the study central to the question, but
its observational human component cannot independently determine
the relative contribution of selection and induction.
|
|
|
|
Spitzer A, Johnson KC, Nomura M, Garofano L, Nehar-Belaid D,
Darnell NG, Greenwald AC, Bussema L, Oh YT, Varn FS, D'Angelo F,
Gritsch S, Anderson KJ, Migliozzi S, Gonzalez Castro LN, Chowdhury
T, Robine N, Reeves C, Park JB, Lipsa A, Hertel F, Golebiewska A,
Niclou SP, Nusrat L, Kellet S, Das S, Moon HE, Paek SH, Bielle F,
Laurenge A, Di Stefano AL, Mathon B, Picca A, Sanson M, Tanaka S,
Saito N, Ashley DM, Keir ST, Ligon KL, Huse JT, Yung WKA,
Lasorella A, Iavarone A, Verhaak RGW, Tirosh I, Suvà ML.
Deciphering the longitudinal
trajectories of glioblastoma ecosystems by integrative single-cell
genomics.
Nat
Genet. 2025 May 9;57(5):1168-1178. doi:
10.1038/s41588-025-02168-4. PMID:
40346362. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This investigation examined matched primary and recurrent
IDH-wildtype glioblastomas from 59 patients. Unlike a model
predicting a uniform mesenchymal shift, the study found
substantial heterogeneity in the trajectories of malignant-cell
states, with no single state consistently enriched across the
entire cohort. It provides important counterbalancing evidence to
studies suggesting a common recurrence-associated phenotype.
Differences between primary and recurrent samples can reflect
treatment effects, baseline tumour biology, spatial sampling and
changes in the surrounding brain tumour ecosystem. The study
strengthens the case for patient-specific evolutionary
trajectories but cannot alone distinguish radiation-induced
transitions from selection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Microenvironmental causality: which radiation-associated
changes in microglia, macrophages, astrocytes, vasculature and
extracellular matrix actually increase tumour growth when
functionally perturbed?
|
|
|
|
A.
Microglia and macrophages: radiation-induced signals that
support regrowth
|
|
|
|
Kioi M, Vogel H, Schultz G, Hoffman RM, Harsh GR, Brown JM.
Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not
angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after
irradiation in mice.
J
Clin Invest. 2010 Feb 22;120(3):694-705. doi:
10.1172/JCI40283. PMID:
20179352. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A landmark study linking post-irradiation hypoxia to the
recruitment of bone marrow-derived cells, particularly
CD11b-positive myelomonocytic cells, and subsequent restoration of
functional tumour vasculature. The investigators inhibited
hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), the stromal cell-derived
factor 1 (SDF-1)/C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) axis, or
myeloid-cell recruitment and observed reduced or delayed tumour
regrowth. The study provides strong preclinical evidence that a
radiation-associated tissue response can causally support
recurrence. Its main limitation is that the xenograft models and
the definition of recruited cells do not fully capture the
complexity of human microglia and macrophage populations. It also
investigates a coupled myeloid–vascular mechanism rather
than isolating a single macrophage phenotype.
|
|
|
|
Alberghina C, Torrisi F, D'Aprile S, Longhitano L, Giallongo S,
Scandura G, Mannino G, Mele S, Sabini MG, Cammarata FP, Russo G,
Abdelhameed AS, Zappalà A, Lo Furno D, Giuffrida R, Li
Volti G, Tibullo D, Vicario N, Parenti R.
Microglia
and glioblastoma heterocellular interplay sustains tumour growth
and proliferation as an off-target effect of radiotherapy.
Cell
Prolif. 2024 Mar 7;57(6):e13606. doi:
10.1111/cpr.13606. PMID:
38454614. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Directly addresses the possibility that radiation affects
non-malignant microglia in ways that support surviving tumour
cells. The authors found that conditioned media from irradiated
human microglia increased proliferation of radiation-naïve
glioblastoma cell lines and altered tumour-cell metabolic
behaviour. In contrast, conditioned media from irradiated
glioblastoma cells produced different, in some conditions
cytotoxic, effects. This distinction is important: the response of
the microenvironment cannot be inferred from the response of the
malignant cells themselves. The work demonstrates paracrine
sufficiency in vitro, but it does not establish which secreted
factor is necessary for the effect or whether the same mechanism
drives recurrence in vivo.
|
|
|
|
Barker
HE, Paget JT, Khan AA, Harrington KJ.
The
tumour microenvironment after radiotherapy: mechanisms of
resistance and recurrence.
Nat
Rev Cancer.
2015 Jun 24;15(7):409-25. doi:
10.1038/nrc3958. PMID:
26105538. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A foundational framework for interpreting radiation-induced
changes in immune cells, vasculature, extracellular matrix and
inflammatory signalling. It is valuable for generating hypotheses
about microenvironmental causality, but evidence from other tumour
types should not automatically be extrapolated to glioblastoma.
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
Astrocytes and senescence: the irradiated brain as a
permissive niche
|
|
|
|
Fletcher-Sananikone E, Kanji S, Tomimatsu N, Di Cristofaro LFM,
Kollipara RK, Saha D, Floyd JR, Sung P, Hromas R, Burns TC,
Kittler R, Habib AA, Mukherjee B, Burma S.
Elimination
of Radiation-Induced Senescence in the Brain Tumor
Microenvironment Attenuates Glioblastoma Recurrence.
Cancer
Res. 2021 Sep 27;81(23):5935-5947. doi:
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0752. PMID:
34580063. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Particularly
relevant to astrocyte-mediated effects. The investigators found
that cranial irradiation induced widespread cellular senescence,
with astrocytes particularly susceptible. Irradiated brain tissue
showed increased expression of the cell-cycle regulator CDKN1A
(p21) and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)
factors, including hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Pre-irradiation
of the brain enhanced growth and invasiveness of subsequently
implanted glioma cells in a MET-dependent setting. The work moves
beyond correlation by linking an irradiated tissue environment to
tumour behaviour and investigating the relevant signalling
pathway. Important limitations include the use of preclinical
models and the difficulty of determining how much of the effect is
attributable to astrocytes versus other senescent brain cells.
|
|
|
|
Gupta
K, Burns TC.
Radiation-Induced
Alterations in the Recurrent Glioblastoma Microenvironment:
Therapeutic Implications.
Front
Oncol.
2018 Nov 8;8:503. doi:
10.3389/fonc.2018.00503. PMID:
30467536. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This review integrates radiation-associated
neuroinflammation, astrocyte reactivity, microglial responses,
extracellular-matrix remodelling, vascular abnormalities and
senescence. It is useful for tracing primary references and
identifying interactions between injury responses and tumour
progression. Its proposed integrated model is biologically
plausible, but several pathways are supported by different
experimental systems rather than by one experiment establishing
the entire causal chain. It should therefore be used as a map of
hypotheses, not as proof that every radiation-associated change
promotes recurrence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
Vasculature and vascular-like tumour cells
|
|
|
|
Kioi
M, Vogel H, Schultz G, Hoffman RM, Harsh GR, Brown JM.
Inhibition
of vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence
of glioblastoma after irradiation in mice.
J
Clin Invest.
2010 Feb 22;120(3):694-705. doi:
10.1172/JCI40283. PMID:
20179352. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This is the key primary reference for the hypothesis that
radiation-induced vascular damage creates a hypoxic environment
that recruits circulating myeloid and other bone-marrow-derived
cells, enabling vascular restoration and tumour regrowth. The
study's importance lies in its functional interventions:
interfering with recruitment or signalling substantially delayed
recurrence. However, the finding should not be simplified into the
claim that all post-radiation angiogenesis is tumour-promoting.
The authors specifically distinguished vasculogenesis from
angiogenesis, and the relevance of these mechanisms depends on
model, timing and cellular definitions.
|
|
|
|
Muthukrishnan SD, Kawaguchi R, Nair P, Prasad R, Qin Y, Johnson M,
Wang Q, VanderVeer-Harris N, Pham A, Alvarado AG, Condro MC, Gao
F, Gau R, Castro MG, Lowenstein PR, Deb A, Hinman JD, Pajonk F,
Burns TC, Goldman SA, Geschwind DH, Kornblum HI.
P300
promotes tumor recurrence by regulating radiation-induced
conversion of glioma stem cells to vascular-like cells.
Nat
Commun. 2022 Oct 19;13(1):6202. doi:
10.1038/s41467-022-33943-0. PMID:
36261421. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
An important
extension of the vascular hypothesis. The authors reported that
radiation can induce glioma stem-like cells to acquire
endothelial-like and pericyte-like characteristics. These
vascular-like cells provided trophic support for tumour-cell
proliferation, and their selective depletion reduced
post-treatment tumour growth in vivo. The study implicated the
histone acetyltransferase p300 in radiation-associated chromatin
remodelling and the acquisition of vascular-associated programmes.
This is stronger than a simple observation of increased vascular
markers because it includes functional depletion and pathway
inhibition. Nevertheless, the extent to which this phenomenon
contributes to human recurrence, compared with recruitment of
non-malignant vascular and myeloid cells, remains unresolved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.
Extracellular matrix and coagulation-associated remodelling
|
|
|
|
Jeon HM, Kim JY, Cho HJ, Lee WJ, Nguyen D, Kim SS, Oh YT, Kim HJ,
Jung CW, Pinero G, Joshi T, Hambardzumyan D, Sakaguchi T, Hubert
CG, McIntyre TM, Fine HA, Gladson CL, Wang B, Purow BW, Park JB,
Park MJ, Nam DH, Lee J.
Tissue factor
is a critical regulator of radiation therapy-induced glioblastoma
remodeling.
Cancer
Cell. 2023 Jul 13 14;41(8):1480-1497.e9. doi:
10.1016/j.ccell.2023.06.007. PMID:
37451272. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This study identified CD142/tissue factor (F3) as a
radiation-induced feature of senescence-associated
β-galactosidase-positive glioblastoma cells. Tissue factor
promoted clonal expansion of irradiated cells and was linked to
both tumour-cell autonomous signalling and extrinsic coagulation
pathways. The authors reported mesenchymal-like state changes,
chemokine secretion, tumour-associated macrophage activation and
extracellular-matrix remodelling. Its strength is the proposed
connection between an irradiated tumour-cell state and several
microenvironmental consequences. The study does not mean that
every observed downstream change is independently necessary for
recurrence; the contribution of coagulation, macrophages and
matrix remodelling needs to be evaluated pathway by pathway.
|
|
|
|
Gupta
K, Burns TC.
Radiation-Induced
Alterations in the Recurrent Glioblastoma Microenvironment:
Therapeutic Implications.
Front
Oncol.
2018 Nov 8;8:503. doi:
10.3389/fonc.2018.00503. PMID:
30467536. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This review discusses changes in matrix composition and
turnover, including matrix metalloproteinases, basement-membrane
components, adhesion molecules and integrin-associated signalling.
It proposes that these changes can alter invasion, tissue
architecture and the interaction between glioma cells and their
surrounding brain. It is a useful source for identifying
matrix-related targets, but it does not provide a single
definitive demonstration that radiation-induced
extracellular-matrix remodelling is necessary for human
recurrence. Direct evidence requires selective inhibition or
restoration of a defined matrix component in an irradiated glioma
model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.
Spatial and cellular mapping after radiotherapy
|
|
|
|
Watson
SS, Duc B, Kang Z, de Tonnac A, Eling N, Font L, Whitmarsh T,
Massara M; iMAXT Consortium; Bodenmiller B, Hausser J, Joyce JA.
Microenvironmental
reorganization in brain tumors following radiotherapy and
recurrence revealed by hyperplexed immunofluorescence imaging.
Nat
Commun.
2024 Apr 15;15(1):3226. doi:
10.1038/s41467-024-47185-9. PMID:
38622132. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This study examines changes in cellular composition and
tissue organisation after irradiation and during tumour regrowth.
In one glioma model, the authors observed increased
tumour-associated myeloid cells, T cells and fibroblast-like
populations after radiation, together with a temporary increase in
extracellular-matrix-rich regions. The regrowing tumours partially
recapitulated the cellular landscape of untreated tumours,
demonstrating that the post-treatment microenvironment is dynamic
rather than a fixed radiation-induced state. This is valuable
descriptive and spatial evidence, but it does not establish that
each enriched cell population or matrix-rich region promotes
growth. Functional perturbation is needed to identify the causal
components.
|
|
|
|
Berg TJ, Pietras A.
Radiotherapy-induced
remodeling of the tumor microenvironment by stromal cells.
Semin
Cancer Biol. 2022 Feb 8;86(Pt 3):846-856. doi:
10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.02.011. PMID:
35143991. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A useful synthesis of radiation effects on endothelial
cells, vasculature, macrophages, microglia, astrocytes and the
extracellular matrix, with particular attention to glioblastoma.
It explains why non-malignant stromal cells exposed during
treatment can activate repair responses that may inadvertently
support tumour progression. As a review, it is best used to trace
and compare the underlying primary studies rather than as direct
evidence of causality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Longitudinal human evidence: can paired primary and
recurrent tumour samples, spatial profiling and single-cell
analyses distinguish radiation effects from temozolomide, surgery
and natural tumour evolution?
|
|
|
|
A.
Genomic evolution of primary and recurrent glioma
|
|
|
|
Johnson BE, Mazor T, Hong C, Barnes M, Aihara K, McLean CY, Fouse
SD, Yamamoto S, Ueda H, Tatsuno K, Asthana S, Jalbert LE, Nelson
SJ, Bollen AW, Gustafson WC, Charron E, Weiss WA, Smirnov IV, Song
JS, Olshen AB, Cha S, Zhao Y, Moore RA, Mungall AJ, Jones SJM,
Hirst M, Marra MA, Saito N, Aburatani H, Mukasa A, Berger MS,
Chang SM, Taylor BS, Costello JF.
Mutational
analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of
recurrent glioma.
Science.
2013 Dec 12;343(6167):189-193. doi:
10.1126/science.1239947. PMID:
24336570. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A foundational study demonstrating that recurrent gliomas
can arise from early diverging populations and that the recurrent
tumour's mutation profile may differ substantially from that of
the original specimen. It established the importance of
reconstructing evolutionary relationships rather than interpreting
every recurrence associated mutation as newly acquired. The major
limitation for the present question is that the study focused on
lower-grade gliomas and their progression, rather than exclusively
on adult-type glioblastoma after standard chemoradiotherapy. It is
best regarded as an evolutionary framework, not direct evidence of
radiation-specific effects.
|
|
|
|
Kim H, Zheng S, Amini SS, Virk SM, Mikkelsen T, Brat DJ, Grimsby
J, Sougnez C, Muller F, Hu J, Sloan AE, Cohen ML, Van Meir EG,
Scarpace L, Laird PW, Weinstein JN, Lander ES, Gabriel S, Getz G,
Meyerson M, Chin L, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Verhaak RG.
Whole-genome
and multisector exome sequencing of primary and post-treatment
glioblastoma reveals patterns of tumor evolution.
Genome
Res. 2015 Feb 3;25(3):316-27. doi:
10.1101/gr.180612.114. PMID:
25650244. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Particularly useful for understanding the effects of spatial
heterogeneity on evolutionary inference. By examining multiple
regions and comparing pretreatment with post-treatment disease,
the study showed that the clonal structure of glioblastoma can be
more complex than a simple linear progression from one dominant
clone. The inclusion of multisector sampling helps reveal
alterations that might be missed in a single biopsy. However,
treatment histories were not uniform across all cases, and
post-treatment genomic changes cannot be assigned uniquely to
radiation, TMZ or natural evolution.
|
|
|
|
Touat M, Li YY, Boynton AN, Spurr LF, Iorgulescu JB, Bohrson CL,
Cortes-Ciriano I, Birzu C, Geduldig JE, Pelton K, Lim-Fat MJ, Pal
S, Ferrer-Luna R, Ramkissoon SH, Dubois F, Bellamy C, Currimjee N,
Bonardi J, Qian K, Ho P, Malinowski S, Taquet L, Jones RE, Shetty
A, Chow KH, Sharaf R, Pavlick D, Albacker LA, Younan N, Baldini C,
Verreault M, Giry M, Guillerm E, Ammari S, Beuvon F, Mokhtari K,
Alentorn A, Dehais C, Houillier C, Laigle-Donadey F, Psimaras D,
Lee EQ, Nayak L, McFaline-Figueroa JR, Carpentier A, Cornu P,
Capelle L, Mathon B, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Chakravarti A, Bi WL,
Chiocca EA, Fehnel KP, Alexandrescu S, Chi SN, Haas-Kogan D,
Batchelor TT, Frampton GM, Alexander BM, Huang RY, Ligon AH,
Coulet F, Delattre JY, Hoang-Xuan K, Meredith DM, Santagata S,
Duval A, Sanson M, Cherniack AD, Wen PY, Reardon DA, Marabelle A,
Park PJ, Idbaih A, Beroukhim R, Bandopadhayay P, Bielle F, Ligon
KL.
Mechanisms and therapeutic
implications of hypermutation in gliomas.
Nature.
2020 Apr 15;580(7804):517-523. doi:
10.1038/s41586-020-2209-9. PMID:
32322066. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
An essential reference for separating TMZ-associated
evolution from radiation associated changes. The authors
characterised hypermutation in gliomas, including recurrent
tumours with mismatch-repair abnormalities following
alkylating-agent exposure. The work links treatment history,
molecular evolution and resistance, and illustrates how a specific
treatment can impose a recognisable selective and mutational
pressure. It does not provide a universal molecular test that
separates all radiation effects from TMZ effects, but it
establishes an important framework for identifying the
contribution of alkylating agent-associated evolution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
Single-cell analysis of treatment-associated evolution
|
|
|
|
Neftel
C, Laffy J, Filbin MG, Hara T, Shore ME, Rahme GJ, Richman AR,
Silverbush D, Shaw ML, Hebert CM, Dewitt J, Gritsch S, Perez EM,
Gonzalez Castro LN, Lan X, Druck N, Rodman C, Dionne D, Kaplan A,
Bertalan MS, Small J, Pelton K, Becker S, Bonal D, Nguyen QD,
Servis RL, Fung JM, Mylvaganam R, Mayr L, Gojo J, Haberler C,
Geyeregger R, Czech T, Slavc I, Nahed BV, Curry WT, Carter BS,
Wakimoto H, Brastianos PK, Batchelor TT, Stemmer-Rachamimov A,
Martinez-Lage M, Frosch MP, Stamenkovic I, Riggi N, Rheinbay E,
Monje M, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Cahill DP, Patel AP, Hunter T, Verma
IM, Ligon KL, Louis DN, Regev A, Bernstein BE, Tirosh I, Suvà
ML.
An
Integrative Model of Cellular States, Plasticity, and Genetics for
Glioblastoma.
Cell.
2019 Jul 18;178(4):835-849.e21.
doi:
10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.024.
PMID:
31327527.
ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Although not primarily a longitudinal treatment study, this
paper is essential for interpreting changes between primary and
recurrent tumours. It demonstrates that malignant cells can occupy
several transcriptional states, influenced by both genetic
alterations and environmental signals. Consequently, a recurrent
tumour may exhibit a different cellular-state composition without
requiring the emergence of a new genetic clone. The work provides
a conceptual basis for distinguishing clonal evolution from
phenotypic adaptation, but it cannot independently determine
whether radiotherapy, TMZ or surgery caused a specific transition.
|
|
|
|
Wang L, Jung J, Babikir H, Shamardani K, Jain S, Feng X, Gupta N,
Rosi S, Chang S, Raleigh D, Solomon D, Phillips JJ, Diaz AA.
A
single-cell atlas of glioblastoma evolution under therapy reveals
cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic therapeutic targets.
Nat
Cancer. 2022 Dec 20;3(12):1534-1552. doi:
10.1038/s43018-022-00475-x. PMID:
36539501. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
One of the most important studies for this research
question. The investigators profiled primary and recurrent
glioblastoma specimens using single-nucleus RNA sequencing,
chromatin accessibility analysis, DNA sequencing and spatial
transcriptomic/proteomic methods. They identified a shift towards
a mesenchymal-like phenotype in recurrent disease, associated with
activator protein 1 (AP-1) signalling, and described interactions
between malignant cells, neuroglia and immune populations.
The
study provides compelling evidence that the cellular ecosystem
changes during treatment and recurrence. However, the authors
recognised several possible explanations for the mesenchymal
shift: preferential survival of cells already in that state,
transition of other cells into it, or differential proliferation.
Because recurrent samples had been exposed to standard treatment,
the study cannot attribute all observed changes to radiotherapy
alone.
|
|
|
|
Spitzer
A, Johnson KC, Nomura M, Garofano L, Nehar-Belaid D, Darnell NG,
Greenwald AC, Bussema L, Oh YT, Varn FS, D'Angelo F, Gritsch S,
Anderson KJ, Migliozzi S, Gonzalez Castro LN, Chowdhury T, Robine
N, Reeves C, Park JB, Lipsa A, Hertel F, Golebiewska A, Niclou SP,
Nusrat L, Kellet S, Das S, Moon HE, Paek SH, Bielle F, Laurenge A,
Di Stefano AL, Mathon B, Picca A, Sanson M, Tanaka S, Saito N,
Ashley DM, Keir ST, Ligon KL, Huse JT, Yung WKA, Lasorella A,
Iavarone A, Verhaak RGW, Tirosh I, Suvà ML.
Deciphering
the longitudinal trajectories of glioblastoma ecosystems by
integrative single-cell genomics.
Nat
Genet.
2025 May 9;57(5):1168-1178. doi:
10.1038/s41588-025-02168-4. PMID:
40346362. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This study is particularly important because it qualifies
the idea of a universal recurrence-associated mesenchymal shift.
Using matched primary and recurrent IDHwildtype glioblastomas, the
investigators found considerable variation in malignant-cell-
state trajectories. No single state was consistently enriched
across the cohort, although specific trajectories were evident in
subsets of patients. The most consistent change was a reduced
malignant-cell fraction accompanied by an increased relative
abundance of glial and neuronal cells in the sampled tumour
ecosystem.
These findings suggest that cellular-state
changes at recurrence are patient-specific and closely linked to
baseline tumour properties and the surrounding microenvironment.
They also demonstrate why smaller cohorts can yield apparently
different conclusions. As with other paired human studies, the
analysis cannot independently separate radiation effects from TMZ,
surgery and natural evolution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
Multimodal profiling and spatial organisation
|
|
|
|
Lucas CG, Al-Adli NN, Young JS, Gupta R, Morshed RA, Wu J,
Ravindranathan A, Shai A, Oberheim Bush NA, Taylor JW, de Groot J,
Villanueva-Meyer JE, Pekmezci M, Perry A, Bollen AW,
Theodosopoulos PV, Aghi MK, Chang EF, Hervey-Jumper SL, Raleigh
DR, Molinaro AM, Costello JF, Diaz AA, Clarke JL, Butowski NA,
Phillips JJ, Chang SM, Berger MS, Solomon DA.
Longitudinal
multimodal profiling of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma reveals the
molecular evolution and cellular phenotypes underlying
prognostically different treatment responses.
Neuro
Oncol. 2024 Nov 19;27(1):89-105. doi:
10.1093/neuonc/noae214. PMID:
39560080. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This investigation evaluated paired initial and recurrent
glioblastomas from 106 patients. It found that some early genomic
alterations were retained between initial and recurrent tumours,
whereas many other alterations were present at only one time
point. The study also demonstrated heterogeneous epigenomic
evolution, with tumours showing increased methylation, decreased
methylation or relative stability. Sarcomatous transformation and
TMZ-associated hypermutation were associated with distinct
molecular and clinical patterns.
Its strength is the size of
the paired cohort and integration of several molecular layers. It
provides a more comprehensive view of tumour evolution than a
single-assay study. Nevertheless, because the samples were
obtained following standard treatment, the findings do not
independently establish which changes were induced by
radiotherapy, TMZ, surgery or spontaneous progression.
|
|
|
|
Ajaib S, Winter-Luke J, Digby RJ, Pollock S, Hemmings G, Gusnanto
A, Chakrabarty A, Ismail A, Wilson E, Hunter B, Filby A, McDonald
D, Brockman AA, Ihrie RA, Stead LF.
Spatial
profiling of longitudinal glioblastoma reveals consistent changes
in cellular architecture, post-treatment.
Neuro
Oncol. 2025 Sep 1;27(12):3145-3160. doi:
10.1093/neuonc/noaf190. PMID:
40898767. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This study used imaging mass cytometry to examine cellular
composition and spatial interactions in paired primary and
recurrent specimens from five patients, with validation using a
separate spatial transcriptomic platform. It reported changes in
cellular prevalence and architecture after treatment, including a
reduction in vascular-cell prevalence and an increased proportion
of normal brain cells in the sampled recurrent tissue.
The
principal contribution is spatial: the study investigates where
cells are located and how their relationships change, rather than
relying exclusively on bulk tumour averages. Its very small
cohort, however, limits generalisability. Moreover, spatial
changes between diagnosis and recurrence remain associations with
the entire treatment and evolutionary interval; they do not
establish the independent causal contribution of radiotherapy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Therapeutic translation: can specific resistance mechanisms
be targeted without compromising the established benefits of
radiotherapy or causing unacceptable injury to normal brain
tissue?
|
|
|
|
A.
Established treatment and the biological basis of radioresistance
|
|
|
|
Stupp R,
Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ,
Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer
RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG,
Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research
and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups;
National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Radiotherapy
plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma.
N
Engl J Med.
2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96. doi:
10.1056/NEJMoa043330. PMID:
15758009. EORTC
trial 22981/26981 /
NCIC
trial CE.3. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
The landmark trial establishing concomitant and adjuvant
temozolomide with radiotherapy as a standard regimen for newly
diagnosed glioblastoma. Median overall survival was 14.6 months
with combined treatment versus 12.1 months with radiotherapy
alone. This is the essential clinical benchmark for
radiosensitization research: an experimental intervention should
preserve the established benefits of the standard regimen.
|
|
|
|
Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y,
Shi Q, Hjelmeland AB, Dewhirst MW, Bigner DD, Rich JN.
Glioma
stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of
the DNA damage response.
Nature.
2006 Oct 18. 2006;444(7120):756-60. doi:
10.1038/nature05236. PMID:
17051156. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A seminal study showing that glioma stem-like cells can
preferentially activate DNA-damage checkpoints and repair
radiation-induced damage. Inhibiting checkpoint kinases Chk1 and
Chk2 reversed radioresistance in experimental systems. The work
provides a mechanistic rationale for targeting DNA-damage
responses, but it does not establish that this approach improves
survival in patients or that it is safe for normal neural
stem-cell populations.
|
|
|
|
Bhat KPL, Balasubramaniyan V, Vaillant B, Ezhilarasan R, Hummelink
K, Hollingsworth F, Wani K, Heathcock L, James JD, Goodman LD,
Conroy S, Long L, Lelic N, Wang S, Gumin J, Raj D, Kodama Y,
Raghunathan A, Olar A, Joshi K, Pelloski CE, Heimberger A, Kim SH,
Cahill DP, Rao G, Den Dunnen WFA, Boddeke HWGM, Phillips HS,
Nakano I, Lang FF, Colman H, Sulman EP, Aldape K.
Mesenchymal
differentiation mediated by NF-κB promotes radiation
resistance in glioblastoma.
Cancer
Cell. 2013 Aug 29;24(3):331-46. doi:
10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.001. PMID:
23993863. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
This study linked NF-κB-associated mesenchymal
differentiation with radiation resistance. It supports
investigation of state-associated transcriptional programmes
rather than assuming resistance is exclusively genetic. However,
mesenchymal-like states are heterogeneous and plastic, and
blocking a single transcriptional programme may not prevent
alternative resistant states from emerging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
DNA-damage-response inhibitors: translational promise and
limitations
|
|
|
|
Rahman R, Shi DD, Reitman ZJ, Hamerlik P, de Groot JF, Haas-Kogan
DA, D'Andrea AD, Sulman EP, Tanner K, Agar NYR, Sarkaria JN,
Tinkle CL, Bindra RS, Mehta MP, Wen PY.
DNA
damage response in brain tumors: A Society for Neuro-Oncology
consensus review on mechanisms and translational efforts in
neuro-oncology.
Neuro
Oncol. 2024 Mar 22;26(8):1367-1387. doi:
10.1093/neuonc/noae072. PMID:
38770568. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A particularly useful starting point for evaluating
inhibitors of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), PARP,
checkpoint kinases and other DNA-damage-response pathways. It
discusses target biology, preclinical models, biomarkers,
combination strategies and clinical-trial design. The review also
illustrates why mechanistic rationale does not reliably predict
clinical benefit: drug exposure, combination toxicity and
tumourspecific vulnerabilities must be considered together.
|
|
|
|
Sim HW, McDonald KL, Lwin Z, Barnes EH, Rosenthal M, Foote MC, Koh
ES, Back M, Wheeler H, Sulman EP, Buckland ME, Fisher L, Leonard
R, Hall M, Ashley DM, Yip S, Simes J, Khasraw M.
A
randomized phase II trial of veliparib, radiotherapy, and
temozolomide in patients with unmethylated MGMT glioblastoma: the
VERTU study.
Neuro
Oncol. 2021 May 13;23(10):1736-1749. doi:
10.1093/neuonc/noab111. PMID:
33984151. Trial
registration ID: ACTRN12615000407594.
ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
One of the most instructive clinical tests of a
radiosensitizing strategy. The trial randomized 125 patients with
newly diagnosed, MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma to a
veliparib-containing regimen or standard radiotherapy plus
temozolomide. Six-month progression-free survival was 46% versus
31%, respectively, but median overall survival was 12.7 versus
12.8 months. The investigators concluded that there was
insufficient evidence of clinical benefit.
The important
lesson is not that PARP inhibition can never work in GBM. Rather,
a favourable preclinical interaction and acceptable feasibility do
not establish a meaningful survival benefit. Biomarker selection,
the specific drug schedule and the contribution of each treatment
component remain important questions.
|
|
|
|
Aiyappa-Maudsley
R, Chalmers AJ, Parsons JL.
Factors
affecting the radiation response in glioblastoma.
Neurooncol
Adv.
2022 Sep 25;4(1):vdac156. doi:
10.1093/noajnl/vdac156. PMID:
36325371. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Reviews
DNA repair, hypoxia, tumour heterogeneity, metabolism and other
determinants of radiation response, including the rationale for
inhibiting DNA-PK. Its discussion of normal-brain toxicity is
particularly relevant: DNA repair is not a tumourexclusive
process, and increasing the radiation sensitivity of normal
tissues could narrow the therapeutic window. This reference is
useful when assessing whether an inhibitor should advance from
cell-based experiments to in vivo testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
Targeting the tumour microenvironment and radiation-associated
recovery
|
|
|
|
Barker HE, Paget JT, Khan AA, Harrington KJ.
The
tumour microenvironment after radiotherapy: mechanisms of
resistance and recurrence.
Nat
Rev Cancer. 2015 Jun 2415(7):409-25. doi:
10.1038/nrc3958. PMID:
26105538. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A broad framework for understanding how radiotherapy affects
not only tumour cells but also vasculature, stromal cells, immune
populations and tissue signalling. It is not a GBM-only review, so
individual mechanisms must be validated specifically in
glioblastoma. Its central contribution is conceptual: radiation
can simultaneously damage tumour cells and remodel the environment
in which surviving cells persist.
|
|
|
|
Kioi M, Vogel H, Schultz G, Hoffman RM, Harsh GR, Brown JM.
Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not
angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after
irradiation in mice.
J
Clin Invest. 2010 Feb 22;120(3):694-705. doi:
10.1172/JCI40283. PMID:
20179352. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
In mouse glioblastoma models, the authors investigated
hypoxia-associated recruitment of myelomonocytic cells and
vascular restoration after irradiation. Interfering with this
process delayed or prevented recurrence in the experimental
systems. The study provides a mechanistic rationale for targeting
specific post-radiation recovery pathways rather than simply
intensifying radiation.
The limitations are important: a
causal effect in a mouse model does not prove that the same
mechanism dominates human recurrence. Moreover, blocking vascular
or myeloid-cell responses could compromise normal tissue recovery,
depending on the pathway, timing and degree of inhibition.
|
|
|
|
Fletcher-Sananikone E, Kanji S, Tomimatsu N, Di Cristofaro LFM,
Kollipara RK, Saha D, Floyd JR, Sung P, Hromas R, Burns TC,
Kittler R, Habib AA, Mukherjee B, Burma S.
Elimination
of Radiation-Induced Senescence in the Brain Tumor
Microenvironment Attenuates Glioblastoma Recurrence.
Cancer
Res. 2021 Sep 27;81(23):5935-5947. doi:
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0752. PMID:
34580063. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Investigates radiation-associated cellular senescence in the
brain tumour microenvironment and the potential contribution of
senescence-associated secretory signalling to recurrence. The
reported experimental findings support investigating senescent
stromal cells and their secreted factors as potential therapeutic
targets.
The translation problem is selectivity: senescence
can be harmful in some contexts but also contributes to tumour
suppression, wound healing and tissue repair. A clinically useful
intervention would need to eliminate or inhibit the relevant
tumour-promoting signals without indiscriminately disrupting
beneficial senescence responses in normal tissue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.
Wider therapeutic landscape
|
|
|
|
Ali MY, Oliva CR, Noman ASM, Allen BG, Goswami PC, Zakharia Y,
Monga V, Spitz DR, Buatti JM, Griguer CE.
Radioresistance
in Glioblastoma and the Development of Radiosensitizers.
Cancers
(Basel). 2020 Sep 3;12(9):2511. doi:
10.3390/cancers12092511. PMID:
32899427. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
A
useful overview of proposed radiosensitization approaches,
covering DNA repair, glioma stem-like cells, hypoxia, metabolic
adaptation and the tumour microenvironment. It helps organize the
field into candidate mechanisms, but the strength of evidence
differs substantially among targets. The proposed interventions
should not be interpreted as equally mature or clinically
validated.
|
|
|
|
Van Eupen L, Waked A, Primac I, Vermeulen K, De Bie I, Benotmane
MA, Quintens R.
Innovative
radiotherapies for the treatment of glioblastoma.
Neurooncol
Adv. 2025 Dec 8;8(1):vdaf255. doi:
10.1093/noajnl/vdaf255. PMID:
41684714. ˍ
|
|
Annotation:
Discusses approaches to improving radiotherapy in GBM,
including strategies informed by tumour heterogeneity and
plasticity. It is relevant to the broader question of whether the
therapeutic ratio can be improved through changes in radiation
delivery or by combining radiotherapy with biologically targeted
approaches. It should be read alongside, rather than as a
substitute for, clinical trial data demonstrating safety and
survival benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*AI assistance: This issue was prepared with the assistance of
ChatGPT (OpenAI). The editor is solely responsible for the final
content.
|